›› 2014, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 137-140.

• 动物营养与饲料科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同季节条件下笼养与平养蛋鸭生产性能的比较分析

韦启鹏1, 刘林秀2, 储怡士2, 季华员2, 宋琼莉2, 唐维国2, 韩晓萍1   

  1. 1. 江西农业大学动物科学技术学院, 江西南昌 330045;
    2. 江西省农业科学院畜牧兽医研究所, 江西莲塘 330200
  • 收稿日期:2014-06-18 出版日期:2014-12-20 发布日期:2014-12-25
  • 通讯作者: 韩晓萍 E-mail:hxp3801147@163.com
  • 作者简介:韦启鹏(1966-),男,江西人,学士,研究员,硕士生导师,从事动物生产科研推广工作.
  • 基金资助:
    国家水禽产业技术体系(CARS-43-33);江西省科技支撑项目(20112BBF60038).

Comparative Analysis of the Production Performance of Ducks in Cage and Rearing Conditions in Different Seasons

WEI Qi-peng1, LIU Lin-xiu2, CHU Yi-shi2, JI Hua-yuan2, SONG Qiong-li2, TANG Wei-guo2, HAN Xiao-ping1   

  1. 1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China;
    2. Institute of Animal Sciences, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Liantang 330200, China
  • Received:2014-06-18 Online:2014-12-20 Published:2014-12-25

摘要: 本试验以山麻鸭为研究对象,比较分析在不同季节条件下笼养与平养蛋鸭生产性能的差异,以筛选出不同季节条件下蛋鸭适宜的饲养方式.结果表明,春季,平养组的产蛋率与总蛋重极显著高于笼养组(P<0.01),而平养组的料蛋比和畸形蛋率极显著低于笼养组(P<0.01);夏季,笼养组的产蛋率显著高于平养组(P<0.05),而笼养组的畸形蛋率极显著低于平养组(P<0.01),但笼养组的总蛋重与料蛋比与平养组相比差异不显著(P>0.05);秋季,笼养组的产蛋率极显著高于平养组(P<0.01),而笼养组的料蛋比显著低于平养组(P<0.05),但笼养组的总蛋重与畸形蛋率与平养组相比差异不显著(P>0.05);冬季,平养组的产蛋率和总蛋重分别显著和极显著高于笼养组(P<0.05;P<0.01),而平养组的畸形蛋率极显著低于笼养组(P<0.01),但平养组的料蛋比与笼养组相比差异不显著(P>0.05).由此可知,在春、冬季节对山麻鸭采用平养方式,可提高蛋鸭的产蛋性能;夏、秋季节对山麻鸭采用笼养方式,有利于蛋鸭生产性能的发挥.

关键词: 山麻鸭; 不同季节; 饲养方式; 生产性能

Abstract: In order to find out the Shanma duck breeding in different seasons, a comparative analysis under different seasonal conditions between rearing on floor and in captivity of production performance were studied.The results showed that in the spring, laying rate and total egg weight of floor group were extremely significantly higher than that of captive group (P<0.01), while the feed ratio and malformation eggs rate in floor group were extremely significantly lower than that in captive group (P<0.01).In summer, laying rate of captive group was significantly higher than that of floor group (P<0.05) and the malformation eggs rate of captive group was extremely significantly lower than that of floor group (P<0.01), but there were no significant difference between the two groups on the total egg weight and feed ratio (P>0.05).In autumn, the laying rate of captive group was extremely significantly higher than that of floor group (P<0.01) and the feed ratio of captive group was significantly lower than that of floor group (P<0.05), but the total egg weight and malformation eggs rate were not significantly different with floor group (P>0.05).In winter, the laying rate and total egg weight of floor group was significantly and extremely significantly higher than that of captive group (P<0.05;P<0.01), respectively, and the malformation eggs rate was extremely significantly lower than that of captive group (P<0.01), but the feed ratio of floor group was not significantly different with captive group (P>0.05).In spring and winter, rearing on Shanma duck in floor method could improve the egg laying performance of ducks.In summer and autumn, rearing in captivity conducive was better for production performance.

Key words: Shanma duck; different seasons; rearing methods; production performance

中图分类号: