奶牛微生物发酵饲料组方及其配套翻料工艺的研究

doi:10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2016.10.013

Abstract

Abstract:

This experiment was conducted to study the effects of eight microbial fermentation feed formulas and the different turning processes on the yeast viable bacterial number and three kinds of nutritional active substance contents to determine the optimal formula and its turning process.Nine kinds of local agricultural products,such as wheat bran,rice bran,cottonseed meal and corn flour,were used as fermentation materials and eight different formulas were designed by mixture design of DPS.Saccharomyces cerevisiae BC,XR4 and Bacillus subtilis A15 were mixed by 2:2:1 and inoculated in the eight formulas to conduct solid state fermentation.The yeast viable bacterial number and the content of mannan,β-glucan and polypeptide were measured to screen the optimal formula.Basing on the optimal formula,the turning process experiment was conducted.There were three groups:Control group,experimental group 1 and 2.The control group was without turning process,while the feed in the experimental group 1 was turned once and the feed in the experimental group 2 was turned twice.The material temperature,yeast viable bacterial number and three kinds of nutritional active substance contents were measured to determine the optimal turning process.The results showed that:① Formula 8 was the optimized formula which consisted of 8.62% wheat bran,5.85% vinegar residue,20.89% rice bran,12.55% cottonseed meal,11.35% corn flour,7.31% corn bran,1.10% corn residue,25.36% sugar residue,5.35% corn germ meal,1.02% (NH₄)₂SO₄,0.50% KH₂PO₄ and 0.10% MgSO₄.② The best turning process of formula 8 was turning twice during the solid state fermentation.When the material temperature reached 35℃,the first turning was conducted and then when the temperature reached 42℃,the material would be turned again.After that the material continued fermenting until the end.Its optimal indexes were viable bacterial number was 4×10⁵ CFU/g,and the content of mannan,β-glucan and polypeptides were 41.28 mg/100 mg,87.06 mg/100 mg and 10.32 μg/100 mg,respectively.Its improved by 100.00%,3.90%,4.89% and 1.67% separately than the control group and improved by 33.33%,3.07%,3.31% and 0.88% comparing with the experimental group 1.

Key words: microbial fermentation feed; turning process; yeast viable bacterial number; nutritional active substance

CLC Number:

S816

GUO Peng, ZHANG Li-ming, ZHANG Zheng, ZHANG Qi-wei, LIU Da-cheng. Study on the Microbial Fermentation Feed Formula and Its Turning Process of Dairy Cows[J]. , 2016, 43(10): 2598-2607.

References

[1] 张恒,刘立鹤,贺国龙.固态发酵技术在饲料资源开发上的研究与应用[J].当代水产,2011,7:66-69.
[2] 吴小燕,郭春华,王之盛,等.微生物发酵饲料对泌乳奶牛生产性能和饲粮养分表观消化率的影响[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(8):2296-2302.
[3] Carlson D,Poulsen H D.Phytate degradation in soaked and fermented liquid feed-effect of diet,time of soaking,heat treatment,phytase activity,pH and temperature[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2003,103(1):141-154.
[4] 熊忙利,张兆顺,吴旭锦.EM发酵饲料对关中奶山羊公羔生长性能和血液生化指标影响[J].陕西农业科学,2015,61(3):64-66.
[5] 夏青,王宝杰,刘梅,等.生物饲料对凡纳滨对虾生长、免疫及消化功能的影响[J].海洋科学,2015,39(8):103-109.
[6] Huber J T,Higginbotham G,Gomez-Alarcon R A,et al.Heat stress interactions with protein,supplemental fat,and fungal cultures[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1994,77(7):2080-2090.
[7] 谢普军,黄立新,张彩虹,等.不同菌种对油橄榄叶发酵饲料的影响[J].林产化学与工业,2015,35(4):59-64.
[8] 李龙.复合益生菌发酵饲料工艺参数优化及品质评定[D].上海:上海交通大学,2010.
[9] 陈洁梅,熊娟,常磊,等.芽孢杆菌在豆粕固态发酵中的应用研究[J].饲料工业,2011,9:15-18.
[10] 左志芳,谢红兵,刘长忠,等.乳酸菌的生理功能及在饲料发酵中的应用[J].河南科技学院学报(自然科学版),2014,42(2):39-44.
[11] 葛晓光.富硒产朊假丝酵母的制备及其生理特性的研究[D].苏州:苏州大学,2010.
[12] 陈光吉,郭春华,娄超,等.微生物发酵饲料替代肉牛精料的饲喂效果及配方筛选的研究[J].饲料研究,2015,4:39-42.
[13] 涂小丽,钟芳,邓伏清,等.微生物发酵饲料对生长猪生产性能和营养物质利用率的影响[J].饲料工业,2015,36(4):36-38.
[14] 刘国娟,刘大程,卢春芳,等.复合菌固态发酵培养基及发酵工艺的优化[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(4):1019-1027.
[15] 卢春芳,刘大程,高民,等.一种生产用酵母菌液态培养基的组方优化[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(8):2303-2313.
[16] 张锦玲,王勇,郭鹏,等.不同菌种组合对固态发酵料中营养活性物质含量及体外消化率的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2015,42(8):2028-2035.
[17] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.SN/T 1800-2006食品和动物饲料微生物学30℃菌落计数方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006.
[18] Boyer R F.Modern Experimental Biochemistry[M].3rd ed.Prentice Hall,2000.
[19] 栗方亮,李忠佩,刘明,等.肥际氮素浓度下添加不同碳源对水稻土微生物特性的影响[J].土壤学报,2012,49(5):971-979.
[20] 王梦芝,喻礼怀,王洪荣,等.不同分子形式氮源对瘤胃微生物发酵及蛋白合成的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2010,46(5):20-24.
[21] 李梅.海洋胶红酵母菌TJY15a菌株产油脂的研究[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2010.
[22] 龚劲松,李恒,刘恒霞,等.碳氮源对枯草芽孢杆菌发酵产β-甘露聚糖酶的影响[J].食品与发酵工业,2015,41(10):34-39.
[23] Chiura H,Iizuka M,Yamamoto T.A glucomannan as an extracellular product of Candida utilis Ⅰ.Production and characterization of a glucomannan[J].Agricultural and Biological Chemistry,1982,46(7):1723-1731.
[24] Petersen G R,Schubert W W,Richards G F,et al.Yeasts producing exopolysaccharides with drag-reducing activity[J].Enzyme and Microbial Technology,1990,12(4):255-259.
[25] Heald P J,Kristiansen B.Synthesis of polysaccharide by yeast-like forms of Aureobasidium pullulans[J].Biotechnology and Bioengineering,1985,27(27):1516-1519.
[26] 包怡红,刘奇,王薇.酿酒酵母胞外多糖发酵工艺条件优化[J].酿酒,2012,39(2):58-62.
[27] 林剑,郑舒文,徐世艾.搅拌与溶氧对黄原胶发酵的影响[J].中国食品添加剂,2003,2:20-23.
[28] 何向飞,张梁,石贵阳.利用溶氧控制策略进行高密度和高强度乙醇发酵的初步研究[J].食品与发酵工业,2008,34(1):20-23.
[29] Debs-Louka E L N,Abraham G,Chabot V,et al.Effect of compressed carbon dioxide on microbial cell viability[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,1999,65(2):626-631.
[30] Dixon N M,Kell D B.The inhibition by CO₂ of the growth and metabolism of micro-organisms[J].Journal of Applied Bacteriology,1989,67(2):109-136.
[31] Jones T,Greenfield P.Effect of carbon dioxide on yeast growth and fermentation[J].Enzyme and Microbial Technology,1982,44:210-223.
[32] 许赣荣.固态发酵原理、设备与应用[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2009.
[33] 毛玮.几种典型综合评价方法的比较及SAS软件实现[D].北京:中国人民解放军军事医学科学院,2011.
[34] 唐启义.DPS数据处理系统:实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘[M].第2版.北京:科学出版社,2010.
[35] 李建明,曲成毅.TOPSIS法及其在SAS软件上的实现[J].中国医院统计,2006,13(1):9-10.

Study on the Microbial Fermentation Feed Formula and Its Turning Process of Dairy Cows

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WANG Yangyang, QIN Shizhen, TANG Defu, SHAO Yuxin, SHI Zhaoguo, WANG Zheng, LI Xing, ZHAO Dongdong. Effects of Zinc, Lactobacillus on Immune and Antioxidant Function of Squabs Infected with Salmonella [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(6): 2276-2285.
[2]	LI Yanghui, XU Tao, ZHANG Shuxian, LIU Ke, JIA Tianqing, CHEN Ning, YIN Junliang, XI Linqiao, WANG Dong, ZHOU Xiaoling. Effect of Replacing Wheat Straw with Cumin Straw on Growth Performance, Slaughter Performance and Plasma Biochemical Parameters of Lambs [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(6): 2296-2304.
[3]	XU Ziyan, JIANG Yang, LIU Xuetao, LIU Bohan, ZHANG Wen, YAN Changguo, CUI Lianhua. Preparation of Pectin/Chitosan Curcumin Microcapsules and Its Study on Simulated Gastrointestinal Environments [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(6): 2312-2320.
[4]	GAO Shihua, WANG Fang, YIN Yexin, TAN Bi'e, YIN Yulong, CHEN Jiashun. Nutritional Value and Anti-nutrient Factor of Fermented Rapeseed Meal and Its Application in Animal Production [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(6): 2333-2341.
[5]	YANG Qinglin, WU Hao, LIU Jiayan, FU Yuxin, ZHOU Shuaishuai, LU Han, DING Manyi, LI Yao. Study of Quercetin Feed Additives on Prolonging Storage Time of Eggs [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(6): 2342-2353.
[6]	QIAO Hongxing, ZHANG Han, ZHAO Shengzhen, SUN Yanting, ZHANG Xiaojing, KANG Yu, BIAN Chuanzhou. Effects of Fermented Eucommia ulmoides Leaves on Production Performance, Antioxidant Properties and Immune Related Gene Expression in Broilers [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(5): 1845-1854.
[7]	OUYANG Kun, WEI Limin, SUN Ruiping, XIE Yali, QI Qi, LI Xiang, LIU Quanwei, CHAO Zhe, ZHANG Yongliang, CHEN Ting. Effects of Curcumin on Growth Performance,Feed Apparent Digestibility and Serum Biochemical Indexes in Hainan Tunchang Pigs [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(5): 1867-1875.
[8]	ZHANG Huaqiang, WANG Pinsheng, LI Xiao, WEI Panpeng, YAN Lingmin, JIANG Bingbing, WANG Zhaogui, WANG Xuefang, ZENG Huanqing, FAN Yi, GAO Zhenglong, WANG Xuebing. Effects of Fermented Hybrid Broussonetia papyrifera on Growth Performance, Meat Quality,Digestive Enzyme Activity and Intestinal Flora Structure of Hu Sheep [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(5): 1876-1887.
[9]	WU Jingxuan, SUN Zheng, MA Xuelian, ZHANG Liyang, LIAO Xiudong, LUO Xugang, LI Sufen, LYU Lin. A Survey on Magnesium Contents in Feed Resources for Livestock and Poultry in China [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(5): 1888-1898.
[10]	XIE Hualiang, LEI Xiaowen, LI Jianjun, LIU Zhenni, ZHONG Yunping, TAN Donghai, ZHANG Qiang. Effects of Earthworm Hydrolysate on Laying Performance,Serum Biochemical Indices,Antioxidant Indices and Immune-related Indices of Laying Hens Aged 105 to 175 Days [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(5): 1899-1906.
[11]	CHEN Xi, LI Xinyi, CHEN Fashun, DUAN Yong, DONG Ling, WU Shujie, FAN Jiancheng, XIANG Bin, YANG Liangyu, ZHANG Limei. Study on the Probiotic Properties and Antimicrobial Activity of 5 Strains of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(5): 2082-2091.
[12]	WANG Wu, WANG Bi, BAI Yu, CHEN Qirong. Research Progress on Antibacterial Activity of Modified Lysozyme [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(3): 942-951.
[13]	CUI Shuang, Wurlig, Alder, XIAO Min, WANG Jianqiu, GONG Jian. Effects of Yeast Selenium Supplementation on Gastrointestinal Microflora in Sheep Under Grazing Conditions [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(3): 952-965.
[14]	HUANG Xiaoqian, YUAN Junzhao, LIU Jinhe, ZOU Hui, GU Jianhong, YUAN Yan, LIU Xuezhong, LIU Zongping, BIAN Jianchun. Protective Effect of Honokiol on Cadmium-induced Renal Injury in Chickens [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(3): 1007-1015.
[15]	NIU Xiaojie, XU Mingguo, XIAO Li, LIU Wenhao, CHEN Chuangfu, WANG Yong. Expression and Purification of IPAJ Protein of Salmonella Pullorum, Preparation of Polyclonal Antibody and Establishment of ELISA Method [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(3): 1218-1228.