1 Bailey J L, Lessard C, Jacques J, et al. Cryopreservation of boar semen and its future importance to the industry. Theriogenology, 2008,70:1251~1259.2 Bathgate R, Eriksson B M, Thomson P C, et al. Field fertility of frozen-thawed boar sperm at low doses using non-surgical, deep uterine insemination. Anim Reprod Sci,2008,103:323~335.3 Behan J R, Watson P F. A field investigation of intra-cervical insemination with reduced sperm numbers in gilts. Theriogenology, 2006, 66: 338~343.4 Bolarin A, Roca J, Rodriguez-Martinez H, et al.Dissimilarities in sows’ ovarian status at the insemination time could explain differences in fertility between farms when frozen-thawed semen is used. Theriogenology, 2006,65:669~680.5 Bolarin A, Hernandez M, Vázquez J M, et al. Use of frozen-thawed semen aggravates the summer-autumn infertility of artificially inseminated weaned sows in the Mediterranean region. J Anim Sci, 2009, 87: 3967~3975.6 Brussow K P, Schneider F, Kanitz W, et al. Studies on fixed-time ovulation induction in the pig. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl,2009,66:187~195.7 Casas I, Sancho S, Briz M, et al. Fertility after post-cervical artificial insemination with cryopreserved sperm from boar ejaculates of good and poor freezability. Anim Reprod Sci, 2010, 118:69~76.8 Day B N. Reproductive biotechnologies: Current status in porcine reproduction. Anim Reprod Sci, 2000, 60/61:161~172.9 Eriksson B M, Petersson H, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Field fertility with exported boar semen frozen in the new FlatPack container. Theriogenology, 2002,58: 1065~1079.10 Fantinati P, Zannoni A, Bernardini C,et al. Laparoscopic insemination technique with low numbers of spermatozoa in superovulated prepuberal gilts for biotechnological application. Theriogenology, 2005, 63: 806~817.11 Garcia E M, Vázquez J M, Parrilla I, et al. Improving the fertilizing ability of sex sorted boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology, 2007, 68:771~778.12 Grossfeld R, Klinc P, Sieg B, et al. Production of piglets with sexed semen employing a non-surgical insemination technique. Theriogenology, 2005, 63:2269~2277.13 Hancock J L. Pig insemination technique. Vet Rec,1959,71:527.14 Johnson L A. Sex preselection in swine: Altered sex ratio in offspring following surgical insemination of flow sorted X- and Y-bearing sperm. Reprod Domest Anim,1991,26:309~314.15 Johnson L A, Rath D, Vázquez J M, et al. Preselection of sex of offspring in swine for production:Current status of the process and its application. Theriogenology, 2005, 63:615~624.16 Martinez E A, Vázquez J M, Roca J, et al. Minimal sperm number for normal fertility after deep intrauterine insemination in non-sedated sows. Reproduction, 2002, 123: 167~170.17 Martinez E A,Vázquez J M, Parrilla I, et al. Incidence of unilateral fertilizations after low dose deep intrauterine insemination in spontaneously ovulating sows under field conditions. Reprod Domest Anim, 2006, 41:41~47.18 Maxwell W M C, Salamon S. Fertility of boar semen after longterm frozen storage. Theriogenology, 1977, 8:206.19 Maxwell W M C, Johnson L A. Physiology of spermatozoa at high dilution rates: The influence of seminal plasma. Theriogenology, 1999, 52:1353~1362.20 Mezalira A, Dallanora D, Bernardi M, et al. Influnence of sperm cell dose and post-insemination backflow on reproductive performance of intrauterine inseminated sows. Reprod Domest Anim, 2005, 40:1~5.21 Nissen A K, Soede N M, Hyttel P, et al. The influence of time of insemination relative to time of ovulation on farrowing frequency and litter size in sows, as investigated by ultrasonography. Theriogenology 1997,47: 1571~1582.22 Olesen A K, Hansen C. Intrauterine insemination of sows by using a two-chamber semen bag system. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl, 2009, 66:81~82.23 Parrilla I, Gil M A, Cuello C, et al. Effect of intra-oviductal laparoscopic manipulation on future reproductive performance of sows. Reprod Domest Anim, 2010, 45:102.24 Pelland C, Cassar G, Kirkwood R, et al. Fertility after intrauterine insemination with conventional or low numbers of spermatozoa in sows with synchronized ovulation. J Swine Health Prod, 2008, 16:188~192. 25 Polge C, Salomon S, Wilmut I. Fertilizing capacity of frozen boar semen following surgical insemination. Vet Rec, 1970, 87:424~428.26 Rath D. Low dose insemination in the sow——A review. Reprod Domest Anim, 2002,37:201~205.27 Rath D, Ruiz S, Sieg B. Birth of female piglets following intrauterine insemination of a sow using flow cytometrically sexed boar semen. Vet Rec, 2003, 152: 400~401.28 Rath D, Johnson L A. Application and commercialization of flow cytometrically sex-sorted semen. Reprod Domest Anim, 2008, 43:338~346.29 Rath D, Bathgate R, Rodriguez-Martinez H, et al. Recent advances in boar semen cryopreservation. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl, 2009, 66:51~66.30 Reicks D L, Levis D G. Fertility of semen used in commercial production and the impact of sperm numbers and bacterial counts. Theriogenology, 2008, 70: 1377~1379.31 Roberts P K, Bilkei G. Field experiences on post-cervical artificial insemination in the sows. Reprod Domest Anim, 2005, 40:489~491.32 Roca J, Vázquez J M, Gil M A, et al. Challenges in pig artificial insemination. Reprod Domest Anim, 2006, 41:43~53.33 Roca J, Parrilla I, Rodriguez-Martinez H, et al. Approaches towards efficient use of boar semen in the pig industry. Reprod Dom Anim, 2011, 46 (Suppl 2):79~83.34 Rozeboom K J, Reicks D L, Wilson M E. The reproductive performance and factors affecting on-farm application of low-dose intrauterine deposit of semen in sows. J Anim Sci, 2004, 82:2164~2168.35 Schoenbeck R A, Didion B A. Fertility of frozen boar sperm when deposited surgically in the oviduct. Theriogenology, 1995, 43:318.36 Sharpe J C, Evans K M. Advances in flow cytometry for sperm sexing. Theriogenology, 2009, 71: 4~10.37 Soede N M, Kemp B K. Expression of oestrus and timing of ovulation in pigs. J Reprod Fertil Suppl,1997,52:91~103.38 Spencer K W, Purdy P H, Blackburn H D, et al. Effect of number of motile, frozen-thawed boar sperm and number of fixed-time inseminations on fertility in estrous-synchronized gilts. Anim Reprod Sci, 2010, 121: 259~266.39 Steverink D W B, Soede N M, Bouwman E G, et al. Influence of insemination-ovulation interval and sperm cell dose on fertilization in sows. J Reprod Fertil, 1997, 111:165~171.40 Thilmant P. Cryopreservation on pig semen: Update and critical steps. Proceeding of annual meeting of the EU-AI-Vets. Ghent, Belgium, 2009.41 Tribout T, Caritez J C, Gruand J, et al. Estimation of genetic trends in French Large White pigs from 1977 to 1998 for growth and carcass traits using frozen semen. J Anim Sci,2010, 88:2856~2867.42 Vázquez J M, Martinez E A, Vázquez J M, et al. Development of a non-surgical deep intrauterine insemination technique. In: Proceedings of the Ⅳ international conference on boar semen preservation,1999.43 Vázquez J M, Martinez E A, Parrilla I, et al. Birth of piglets after deep intrauterine insemination with flow cytometrically sorted spermatozoa. Theriogenology, 2003,59:1605~1614.44 Vázquez J M, Martinez E A, Roca J, et al. Improving the effiency of sperm technologies in pigs: The value of deep intrauterine insemination.Theriogenology,2005,63:536~547.45 Vázquez J M, Martinez E A, Parrilla I, et al. Laparoscopic intraoviductal insemination in pigs: A new tool for improving the efficiency of sex sorted spermatozoa. Reprod Domest Anim,2006,41:298.46 Vázquez J M, Roca J, Gil M A, et al. New developments in low-dose insemination technology. Theriogenology, 2008, 70:1216~1224.47 Watson P F, Behan J R. Intrauterine insemination of sows with reduced sperm numbers: Results of a commercially based field trial.Theriogenology, 2002, 57:1683~1693. 48 Wongtawan T, Saravia F, Wallgren M, et al. Fertility after deep intra-uterine artificial insemination of concentrated low-volume boar semen doses. Theriogenology, 2006, 65:773~787. |