不同β-受体激动剂添加模式对肉牛血液生化指标和激素水平的影响

doi:10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2017.09.014

《中国畜牧兽医》 ›› 2017, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 2638-2643.doi: 10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2017.09.014

不同β-受体激动剂添加模式对肉牛血液生化指标和激素水平的影响

刘佳^1,2, 张凯², 龙瑞军³, 张军民², 赵青余², 王洪亮⁴, 赵福忠⁴

1. 兰州大学草地农业科技学院, 兰州 730030;
2. 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所, 农业部华北动物遗传资源与营养科学观测站, 北京 100193;
3. 兰州大学生命科学学院, 兰州 730030;
4. 黑龙江省农垦科学院畜牧兽医研究所, 哈尔滨 150038

收稿日期:2017-02-28 出版日期:2017-09-20 发布日期:2017-09-22
通讯作者: 龙瑞军 E-mail:longrj@lzu.edu.cn
作者简介:刘佳(1991-),女,山西阳泉人,硕士生,研究方向:动物营养与畜产品质量安全,E-mail:liujia14@lzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
公益性行业（农业）科研专项经费项目（201203088）

Different Feeding Mode of β-agonists Treatments on Plasma Biochemical Parameters and Internal Hormone Levels in Cattle

LIU Jia^1,2, ZHANG Kai², LONG Rui-jun³, ZHANG Jun-min², ZHAO Qing-yu², WANG Hong-liang⁴, ZHAO Fu-zhong⁴

1. College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China;
2. Scientific Observing and Experiment Station of Animal Genetic Resource and Nutrition in North China, Ministry of Agriculture, Institution of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100193, China;
3. School of Life Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China;
4. Institution of Animal Science, Academy of Land Reclamation Science, Haerbing 150038, China

Received:2017-02-28 Online:2017-09-20 Published:2017-09-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

试验旨在研究不同β-受体激动剂添加模式对肉牛血液生化指标和激素水平的影响。选取15头体况良好、体重相近（257.9 kg±33.3 kg）的西门塔尔肉牛，随机分为3组，每组5头。对照组饲喂基础日粮；试验Ⅰ组添加莱克多巴胺，添加剂量为670.0 μg/kg体重；试验Ⅱ组添加莱克多巴胺、沙丁胺醇和克伦特罗的混合物，添加剂量分别为223.3、50.0、5.3 μg/kg体重。给药期28 d，停药期28 d。结果表明，与对照组相比，在给药第28天时，试验Ⅰ组肉牛血浆中游离脂肪酸（FFA）浓度显著降低（P<0.05），试验Ⅱ组肉牛血浆中葡萄糖（GLU）和游离脂肪酸浓度均显著降低（P<0.05）；整个试验过程中，除停药第28天时试验Ⅰ组肉牛血浆中胰岛素（INS）水平显著高于对照组外（P<0.05），β-受体激动剂对各试验组血浆中激素水平均无显著影响（P>0.05）。综合上述试验结果，肉牛血浆中的FFA可作为β-受体激动剂潜在的生物标志物，可通过对其的监测来监管β-受体激动剂在肉牛生产环节中的非法使用。

关键词: β -受体激动剂; 肉牛; 血液; 生化指标; 激素水平

Abstract:

The experiment was aimed to study different feeding mode of β-agonists treatments on plasma parameters and internal hormone levels in cattle. 15 healthy Simontal cattle with similar body weight (257.9 kg±33.3 kg) were randomly divided into three groups. The cattle were fed with the same basal diet, and the test group Ⅰ were daily treated with 670.0 μg/(kg·BW) ractopamine while the test group Ⅱ were daily treated with a mixture of ractopamine, salbutamol and clenbuterol (223.3, 50.0 and 5.3 μg/(kg·BW), respectively) for 28 consecutive days, and the period of withdrawal was 28 days. The results showed that at the 28th day of the treatment,plasma free fatty acid (FFA) concentrations in test groupsⅠwere significantly lower than that in control group (P<0.05), plasma glucose (GLU) and FFA concentrations in test groupsⅡwere significantly lower than that in control group (P<0.05);The levels of hormone in plasma were not significantly affected by β-agonists during the whole test period (P>0.05) except that the INS level in test groupsⅠ was significantly lower than that in control group (P<0.05) at the 28th day of the withdrawal.These results demonstrated that plasma FFA in cattle could be used as potential biomarkers to supervise the illegal use of β-agonists.

Key words: β-agonists; cattle; blood biochemical parameters; hormone levels

中图分类号:

S816.7

刘佳, 张凯, 龙瑞军, 张军民, 赵青余, 王洪亮, 赵福忠. 不同β-受体激动剂添加模式对肉牛血液生化指标和激素水平的影响[J]. 《中国畜牧兽医》, 2017, 44(9): 2638-2643.

LIU Jia, ZHANG Kai, LONG Rui-jun, ZHANG Jun-min, ZHAO Qing-yu, WANG Hong-liang, ZHAO Fu-zhong. Different Feeding Mode of β-agonists Treatments on Plasma Biochemical Parameters and Internal Hormone Levels in Cattle[J]. , 2017, 44(9): 2638-2643.

参考文献

[1] Courant F, Pinel G, Bichon E, et al. Development of a metabolomic approach based on liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry to screen for clenbuterol abuse in calves[J]. Analyst, 2009, 134(8):1637-1646.
[2] 毕言锋. 基于高分辨质谱技术的β-受体激动剂在猪体内的代谢研究[D].北京:中国农业大学, 2014.
[3] 陈刚, 周光宏. β-肾上腺素能激动剂作用机理及对生长代谢的影响[J]. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 1998, 28(4):38-39.
[4] 吴玉苹. 基于UHPLC-QTOF/MS代谢组学技术对猪尿中β₂-受体激动剂残留的研究[D]. 北京:中国农业大学, 2015.
[5] 梁晓维, 年芳, 张军民, 等. 肉牛血浆和尿液中莱克多巴胺残留消除规律分析[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2016, 51(3):8-14.
[6] Dervilly-Pinel G, Chereau S, Cesbron N, et al. LC-HRMS based metabolomics screening model to detect various β-agonists treatments in bovines[J]. Metabolomics, 2015, 11(2):403-411.
[7] Li L, Tang C, Zhang J, et al. The potential of various living tissues for monitoring clenbuterol abuse in food-producing Chinese Simmental beef cattle[J]. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2016, 40(1):72-77.
[8] Tang C, Zhang J, Li L, et al. Ractopamine residues in urine, plasma and hair of cattle during and after treatment[J]. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2014, 38(3):149-154.
[9] Tang C, Liang X, Zhang K, et al. Residues of ractopamine and Identification of its glucuronide metabolites in plasma, urine, and tissues of cattle[J]. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2016, 40(9):738-743.
[10] Zhang K, Liang X, Su C, et al. Salbutamol residues in plasma, urine and hair of heifers after a single dose and throughout[J]. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2016,40(6):454-459.
[11] Li L, Zhang J, Tang C, et al. Accumulation of clenbuterol residues in the hair of Chinese Simmental beef cattle during and after treatment[J]. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2014, 38(1):52-56.
[12] Liang X, Zhang K, Zhang J, et al. Ractopamine residues in beef cattle hair during and after treatment[J]. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2016, 40(2):153-158.
[13] Zhang K, Liang X, Zhang J, et al. Hair analysis to monitor the illegal use of salbutamol in beef cattle[J]. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2016,41(1):65-70.
[14] Tang C, Zhang K, Liang X, et al. Application of a NMR-based untargeted quantitative metabonomic approach to screen for illicit salbutamol administration in cattle[J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2016,408(17):1-7.
[15] Zimmerli U V, Blum J W. Acute and longterm metabolic, endocrine, respiratory, cardiac and skeletal muscle activity changes in response to perorally administered β-adrenoceptor agonists in calves[J]. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 1990, 63(1-5):157-172.
[16] Beermann D H, Butler W R, Hogue D E, et al. Cimaterol-induced muscle hypertrophy and altered endocrine status in lambs[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1987, 65(6):1514-1524.
[17] Dunshea F R, King R H. Temporal response of plasma metabolites to ractopamine treatment in the growing pig[J]. Crop and Pasture Science, 1994, 45(8):1683-1692.
[18] Buyse J, Decuypere E, Huyghebaert G, et al. The effect of clenbuterol supplementation on growth performance and on plasma hormone and metabolite levels of broilers[J]. Poultry Science, 1991, 70(4):993-1002.
[19] Vandenberg G W, Leatherland J F, Moccia R D. The effects of the beta-agonist ractopamine on growth hormone and intermediary metabolite concentrations in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum)[J]. Aquaculture Research, 1998, 29(2):79-87.
[20] Andrews F M, Mcfariane D, Stokes A M, et al.Freedom of information summary-original new animal drug application[Z]. FDA,2007.
[21] 丁焕中, 陈杖榴, 杨志凌. 营养重分配剂莱克多巴胺的药理作用和应用[J]. 兽药与饲料添加剂, 2002, 7(1):18-20.
[22] 郑元林, 韩正康, 陈杰, 等. 克仑特罗对绵羊肝脏血液中IGF-Ⅰ、GH和胰岛素水平的影响[J]. 动物学研究, 2001,22(3):246-249.
[23] 徐秀娣, 沈伟平. 牛生长激素的应用前景初探[J]. 上海奶牛,1992(1):25-27.
[24] Fiems L O, Decuypere E, Boucqué C V. A note on the effect of feeding cimaterol on some endocrinological parameters and growth in different types of finishing beef bulls[J]. Anim Prod, 1989, 48:601-605.
[25] Claeys M C, Mulvaney D R, McCarthy F D, et al. Skeletal muscle protein synthesis and growth hormone secretion in young lambs treated with clenbuterol[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1989, 67(9):2245-2254.
[26] Dawson J M, Craigon J, Buttery P J, et al. Influence of diet and β-agonist administration on plasma concentrations of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 in young steers[J]. British Journal of Nutrition, 1993, 70(1):93-102.
[27] Sauerwein H, Rinke L M, Richter T, et al. Patterns of plasma cortisol, luteinizing hormone (LH), growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1(IGF-1) concentrations in clenbuterol treated veal calves[J]. Journal of Reproduction and Development, 1993, 39(3):229-235.
[28] 周光宏, 韩正康, 孙晨华. 克伦特罗对鸭的产肉性能和有关代谢指标的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 1991, 14(4):81-86.
[29] 王成. 莱克多巴胺对肥育猪生产性能, 胴体品质及代谢的影响研究[D]. 雅安:四川农业大学, 2001.
[30] Emery P W, Rothwell N J, Stock M J, et al. Chronic effects of β2 agonists on body composition and protein synthesis in the rat[J]. Bioscience Reports, 1984, 4(1):83-91.

不同β-受体激动剂添加模式对肉牛血液生化指标和激素水平的影响

Different Feeding Mode of β-agonists Treatments on Plasma Biochemical Parameters and Internal Hormone Levels in Cattle

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李杨辉, 许涛, 张淑贤, 刘珂, 贾天晴, 陈宁, 尹君亮, 席琳乔, 王栋, 周小玲. 孜然秸秆替代小麦秸秆对羔羊生长和屠宰性能及血浆生化指标的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(6): 2296-2304.
[2]	张殿琦, 马鑫浩, 杨志梅, 梅楚刚, 昝林森. 秦川肉牛PAI1基因生物信息学分析及其对肌内脂肪细胞增殖和分化的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(5): 1729-1741.
[3]	欧阳坤, 魏立民, 孙瑞萍, 解娅立, 齐琪, 李想, 刘圈炜, 晁哲, 张永亮, 陈婷. 姜黄素对海南屯昌猪生长性能、饲料养分表观消化率和血清生化指标的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(5): 1867-1875.
[4]	任建刚, 关鹏, 黄建智, 盛月云, 包铁柱, 马治平, 钱文熙. 饲粮能量水平对安格斯公牛育肥性能及血清生化指标的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(3): 966-976.
[5]	孙燕勇, 马凤英, 郭丽丽, 刘在霞, 刘斌, 张文广, 刘永斌. 动物血液转录组测序的应用研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(2): 460-468.
[6]	孙浩彬, 薛玉洋, 牛玉杰, 牛俊丽, 张文举, 陈程. 全株小黑麦干草对育成牛营养物质表观消化率、血清生化指标及瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(1): 106-114.
[7]	魏佳, 柏琴, 罗晓林, 官久强, 安添午, 赵洪文, 谭武, 李华德, 谢荣清, 沙泉, 江明锋, 张翔飞. 不同断奶模式对犊牦牛生长发育、血清生化指标及抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(9): 3400-3410.
[8]	汪曼丽, 谭子涵, 王帅杰, 李倩, 曾一桐, 王蕾, 赵迪, 张倩, 侯永清. 槲皮素对PEDV感染幼龄仔猪的生长性能、血液生化指标和肠道吸收与屏障功能的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(9): 3411-3418.
[9]	陈丽红, 赵梦迪, 刘可园, 宁浩然, 崔凯, 李光玉, 孙伟丽. 13~17周龄雄性雉鸡饲粮适宜代谢能水平研究[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(8): 2943-2952.
[10]	陈雪颖, 王慧晟, 吴杰, 邓波, 刁新平. 饲粮中添加地衣芽孢杆菌和解淀粉芽孢杆菌对断奶仔猪生长性能及血液指标的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(7): 2547-2556.
[11]	任建明, 纪鹏, 张晓松, 魏彦明, 朱潇鹏, 朱跃明. 健脾消导中药复方对6月龄西杂牛生长性能、瘤胃发酵参数和血清指标的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(7): 2593-2600.
[12]	范秋丽, 阮栋, 蒋守群, 程忠刚, 汪汉华. 26~45日龄竹丝鸡饲粮粗蛋白质需要量研究[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(5): 1727-1737.
[13]	杨娟, 郭帅, 韩世昌, 张年, 张凤, 陶虎, 熊琪. 6月龄波尔山羊与麻城黑山羊血液指标、屠宰性能差异研究[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(4): 1332-1342.
[14]	蒋恒, 王怀树, 卓娜, 王建国, 任佳, 高如军, 武玉平, 高凤芹. 苜蓿草粉对育肥猪生长性能、血清抗氧化及免疫性能相关指标的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(3): 953-961.
[15]	范秋丽, 蒋守群, 汪汉华, 阮栋, 程忠刚. 1~25日龄竹丝鸡饲粮粗蛋白质需要量研究[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(2): 501-509.