大额牛×婆罗门(GBF1)牛与云岭牛肉品质比较研究

doi:10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2015.08.018

›› 2015, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 2042-2047.doi: 10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2015.08.018

大额牛×婆罗门(GBF₁)牛与云岭牛肉品质比较研究

王喆, 赵志军, 李天平, 王安奎, 和霁恬, 高月娥, 和占星, 黄必志

云南省草地动物科学研究院, 昆明 650212

收稿日期:2015-02-05 出版日期:2015-08-20 发布日期:2015-08-27
通讯作者: 黄必志 E-mail:hbz@ynbp.cn
作者简介:王喆(1972-),男,云南陆良人,硕士,副研究员,研究方向:牛羊繁殖与肉质,E-mail:ynwangzhe@126.com
基金资助:
云南省科技厅基础研究面上基金(2012FB199);云南省科技厅基础研究重大专项(2013FC004)

Comparison on the Meat Quality in Gayal×Brahman (GBF₁) Cattle and Yunling Cattle

WANG Zhe, ZHAO Zhi-jun, LI Tian-ping, WANG An-kui, HE Ji-tian, GAO Yue-e, HE Zhan-xing, HUANG Bi-zhi

Yunnan Academy of Grassland and Animal Science, Kunming 650212, China

Received:2015-02-05 Online:2015-08-20 Published:2015-08-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究旨在比较大额牛和婆罗门杂交后代(GBF₁)与云岭牛肉品质,评估大额牛杂交利用潜能。选择年龄相近、性别相同的GBF₁牛和云岭牛进行育肥、屠宰,采集100个肉样冻存。以肉质较好的云岭牛肉为对照,检测GBF₁牛肉的剪切力、失水率、系水力、蒸煮损失。结果表明,GBF₁牛肩峰剪切力显著高于云岭牛(P< 0.05),其他部位肉剪切力两品种间没有显著差异(P> 0.05)。GBF₁牛10个部位肉的平均剪切力、失水率、蒸煮损失分别为3.50 kg、24.15%、27.56%,低于云岭牛;平均系水力64.60%,高于云岭牛,但差异均不显著(P> 0.05)。由此可知,GBF₁牛肉品质与云岭牛相似,且均较好。

关键词: 大额牛; 婆罗门; 种间杂交; GBF₁牛; 云岭牛; 肉品质

Abstract: This study was aimed to compare the meat quality of Gayal×Brahman (GBF₁) cattle and Yunling cattle, evaluate the potential of crossbreeding utilization of Gayal.GBF₁ cattle and Yunling cattle which had same ages and same gender were selected to be fattened and slaughtered.100 meat samples of GBF₁ feedlot steers and Yunling feedlot steers were collected and sealed in clean fresh frozen bag.With the meat samples from Yunling feedlot steers as the control, the shear force, lose water ratio, water holding ratio and cooking loss of meat samples from GBF₁ were determined.The results showed that the shear force of shoulder crest from GBF₁ cattle were significantly higher than that from Yunling cattle (P< 0.05), and there were no significant differences in the others meat samples (P> 0.05).The average shear force, average lose water ratio, average cooking loss of 10 different cuts from GBF₁cattle were 3.50 kg, 24.15%, 27.56%, respectively and lower than that of Yunling cattle (P> 0.05).The average water holding ratio was 64.60% and higher than that of Yunling cattle (P> 0.05).In conclusion, the meat quality of GBF₁ cattle was good, similar to that of Yunling cattle.

Key words: Gayal; Brahman; interspecies crossbreeding; GBF₁ cattle; Yunling cattle; meat quality

中图分类号:

S823

王喆, 赵志军, 李天平, 王安奎, 和霁恬, 高月娥, 和占星, 黄必志. 大额牛×婆罗门(GBF₁)牛与云岭牛肉品质比较研究[J]. , 2015, 42(8): 2042-2047.

WANG Zhe, ZHAO Zhi-jun, LI Tian-ping, WANG An-kui, HE Ji-tian, GAO Yue-e, HE Zhan-xing, HUANG Bi-zhi. Comparison on the Meat Quality in Gayal×Brahman (GBF₁) Cattle and Yunling Cattle[J]. , 2015, 42(8): 2042-2047.

参考文献

[1] 毛华明,邓卫东,文际昆.大额牛生物学特征及研究开发利用潜力[J].云南农业大学学报,2005,20(2):258-261.
[2] 周国利,曹阳,金海国.牛肉质性状在遗传育种中的研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(29):12696-12698.
[3] 周磊,于青云,杜玮.不同品种牛肉品质研究[J].新疆农业科学,2007,44(4):534-538.
[4] Cuvelier C,Cabaraux J F,Dufrasne I,et al.Performance,slaughter characteristics and meat quality of young bulls from Belgian Blue,Limousin and Aberdeen Angus breeds fattened with sugar-beet pulp or a cereal-based diets[J].Animal Science,2006,88(1):125-132.
[5] Vieira C,Cerdeo A,Serrano E,et al.Breed and ageing extent on carcass and meat quality of beef from adult steers (oxen)[J].Livestock Science,2007,107(1):62-69.
[6] Garcia P T,Pensel N A,Sancho A M,et al.Beef lipids in relation to animal breed and nutrition in Argentina[J].Meat Science,2008,79(3):500-508.
[7] Muchenje V,Hugo A,Dzama K,et al.Cholesterol levels and fatty acid profiles of beef from three cattle breeds raised on natural pasture[J].Journal of Food Composition and Analysis,2009,22(4):354-358.
[8] De Smet S,Raes K,Demeyer D.Meat fatty acid composition as affected by fatness and genetic factors:A review[J].Animal Research,2004,53(2):81-98.
[9] Laborde F L,Mandell I B,Tosh J J,et al.Breed effects on growth performance,carcass characteristics,fatty acid composition,and palatability attributes in finishing steers[J].Journal of Animal Science,2001,79(2):355-365.
[10] Koutsidis G,Elmore J S,Oruna-Concha M J,et al.Water-soluble precursors of beef flavour:Ⅰ.Effect of diet and breed[J].Meat Science,2008,79(1):124-130.
[11] 和占星,张继才,亐开兴,等.大额牛(Bos frontalis)与瘤牛(Bos indicus)的种间杂交研究[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(17):3622-3633.
[12] 亐开兴,和占星,张继才,等.大额牛与婆罗门种间杂交的亲子鉴定[J].云南农业大学学报,2008,23:339-342.
[13] 王喆,杨世平,袁希平,等.大额牛×婆罗门(GBF₁)、BMY牛血液生化指标研究[J].中国畜牧兽医,2010,37(12):89-91.
[14] 王喆,李天平,王安奎,等.肉牛品种、性别对牛肉嫩度的影响[J].中国农学通报,2014,30:18-21.
[15] 王喆,袁希平,王安奎,等.牛品种、性别对高档牛肉粗蛋白和氨基酸含量的影响[J].云南农业大学学报,2011,5:633-638.
[16] 王喆,袁希平,王安奎,等.牛品种和性别对牛肉脂肪及脂肪酸含量的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2011,39(4):24-28.
[17] 黄必志.BMY肉牛[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,2014.
[18] 范江平,叶绍辉,葛长荣,等.杂交大额牛肉质特性研究初报[J].云南农业大学学报,2005,20(4):600-602.
[19] Peachey B M,Purchas R W,Duizer L M.Relationships between sensory and objective measures of meat tenderness of beef m.longissimus thoracis from bulls and steers[J].Meat Science,2002,60(3):211-218.
[20] 夏秀芳,孔保华,郭园园.反复冷冻—解冻对猪肉品质特性和微观结构的影响[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(3):982-988.
[21] 罗欣,周光宏.电刺激和延迟冷却对牛肉食用品质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(1):188-194.
[22] 岳常彦.对鲁西黄牛肉用性能的研究[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2007,4:53.
[23] Carmack C F,Kastner C L,Dikeman M E,et al.Sensory evaluation of beef-flavor-intensity,tenderness,and juiciness among major muscles[J].Meat Science,1995,39(1):143-147.
[24] Jeremiah L E,Dugan M E R,Aalhus J L,et al.Assessment of the chemical and cooking properties of the major beef muscles and muscle groups[J].Meat Science,2003,65(3):985-992.
[25] 葛长荣,田允波,陈韬,等.大额牛肉质特性研究[J].中国农业科学,1996,29(4):75-78.
[26] 郭建凤,武英,呼红梅,等.不同储存温度、时间对长白猪肌肉pH及失水率的影响[J].西北农业学报,2009,18(1):33-36.
[27] 姜碧杰,昝林森,辛亚平,等.性别对秦川牛肉品质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(6):1-4.
[28] 李娜,张志胜,李海鹏,等.云南黄牛育肥后不同部位肉食用品质比较[J].食品工业科技,2015,1:54-60.
[29] 黄明,黄峰,张首玉.热处理对猪肉食用品质的影响[J].食品科学,2009,30(23):189-192.

大额牛×婆罗门(GBF₁)牛与云岭牛肉品质比较研究

Comparison on the Meat Quality in Gayal×Brahman (GBF₁) Cattle and Yunling Cattle

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李梦媛, 刘梦潜, 康佳佳, 黄英, 段勇, 贾俊静, 葛长荣, 曹玮娜. 胍基乙酸对肉鸡肉品质和腹脂沉积的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(4): 1385-1394.
[2]	熊太第, 蒋守群, 张辉华, 朱翠. 家禽运输应激及其缓解措施研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(3): 977-988.
[3]	李彬, 史正玲, 曾子悠, 黄颖妍, 李林, 杜自来, 纪一凡, 王迪, 虞洁, 梅绍锋. 菊苣对不同性别麻黄肉鸡生长性能、屠宰性能和肉品质的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(2): 500-511.
[4]	李明博, 高青山, 李官浩, 张魁, 崔莲花, 侯丽娜. 中草药饲料添加剂对延边黄牛肉品质与风味物质的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(2): 531-542.
[5]	和占星, 黄梅芬, 成玉梅, 张泉鹏, 张继才, 杨凯, 王安奎, 周亚平, 黄必志. 独龙牛和云岭牛初乳的理化特性比较[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(6): 2156-2164.
[6]	张淑雅, 张纪桥, 蔡瑛婕, 曹敞, 张建华, 张建勤. 不同日龄略阳乌鸡肉品质对比与最佳上市日龄分析[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(6): 2165-2175.
[7]	刘小平, 史卓言, 冀祥, 楚潇然, 侯俊杰, 宋祯, 李晓霞, 杨又兵, 张古栾, 王建平, 文凤云. 不同屠宰活重豫西黑猪的营养成分及肉质特性分析[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(10): 3771-3781.
[8]	孙颢轩, 刘国华, 蔡辉益, 陈志敏. 饲喂发酵饲料对肉鸡生长性能、养分利用率、肠道健康和肉品质的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(10): 3782-3790.
[9]	陶勇, 任善茂, 宋颜颜, 董晓君, 赵旭庭. 复合植物提取物对育肥期苏姜猪胴体性状、肌肉品质及血清指标的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(1): 161-168.
[10]	王一冰, 邝智祥, 张盛, 苟钟勇, 林厦菁, 蒋守群. 3种添加剂对91~115日龄清远麻鸡生长性能、抗氧化性能和肉品质的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2021, 48(8): 2787-2796.
[11]	张杏艳, 蓝海恩, 谢炳坤, 潘天彪, 陈宝剑, 关志惠, 陈中华. 性别对杜陆猪肉品质及风味影响的代谢组学分析[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2021, 48(10): 3585-3594.
[12]	李松桥, 李瑞, 黄丽琴, 唐晶, 李国祥, 沈维军, 闫景彩. 枸杞渣和甘草混合添加剂对黄羽肉鸡生产性能和肉品质的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2020, 47(8): 2395-2403.
[13]	王丽赛, 廖秀冬, 冯艳忠, 张丽阳, 吕林, 李素芬, 罗绪刚. 日粮硒水平对22~42日龄肉仔鸡生长性能及肉品质的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2020, 47(7): 2063-2070.
[14]	曹艳红, 宣泽义, 陈宝剑, 吴柱月, 黄明光, 赵琳玲, 周恒, 罗蒙和, 韦明松, 莫柳忠, 邓红英, 黄海会, 陈少梅. 隆林山羊与努比亚山羊杂交对后代生产性能和肉品质影响的研究[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2020, 47(7): 2133-2141.
[15]	范秋丽, 蒋守群, 苟钟勇, 李龙, 林厦菁, 王一冰, 陈芳. 益生菌、低聚壳聚糖、酸化剂及复合酶对1~66日龄黄羽肉鸡生长性能、免疫功能、胴体性能和肉品质的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2020, 47(5): 1360-1372.