内蒙古敖汉旗地区基础母牛存栏量调查方案的研究

›› 2012, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 134-138.

内蒙古敖汉旗地区基础母牛存栏量调查方案的研究

刘喜冬^1,2, 王延晖², 高会江², 许尚忠², 李俊雅²

1. 东北农业大学动物科学技术学院,黑龙江哈尔滨 150030;2. 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所, 中国农业科学院肉牛研究中心,农业部畜禽遗传资源与利用重点开放实验室,北京 100193

收稿日期:2011-09-20 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2012-04-20 发布日期:2012-04-20
通讯作者: 李俊雅

A Sampling Survey on Elementary Heifers Storage in Aohan Region of Inner Mongolia

LIU Xi-dong^1,2, WANG Yan-hui², GAO Hui-jiang², XU Shang-zhong², LI Jun-ya²

1. College of Animal Science and Technology,Northeast Agricultural University,Harbin 150030,China;2. Key Laboratory of Farm Animal Genetic Resources and Utilization of Ministry Agriculture, Beef Cattle Research Center, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193,China

Received:2011-09-20 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2012-04-20 Published:2012-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对畜禽存栏量的调查是农业统计调查的重要内容之一,其统计调查方法主要是抽样调查。本研究旨在通过实例抽样调查,拟出合适的抽样方法对全国的基础母牛存栏量进行调查估计。采用二阶PPS(sampling with probability proportional to size)抽样、分层等比例抽样、分层二阶典型抽样对内蒙古敖汉旗肉牛存栏量进行调查,比较3种方法的准确度。结果表明, 在此3种方法10%的样本量下进行比较时,3种抽样方法按相对误差大小顺序排列为:分层二阶典型抽样＜分层等比例抽样＜二阶PPS抽样,其相对误差分层二阶典型抽样比分层等比例抽样、二阶PPS抽样分别小60.38%、92.83%;置信区间按大小顺序排列为:分层二阶典型抽样＜分层等比例抽样＜二阶PPS抽样。总体而言,分层二阶典型抽样的准确度相对较高,相对误差最小,仅为0.0412。故在实际应用当中,分层二阶典型抽样目前较为适用。

关键词: 肉牛存栏量; 分层抽样; 二阶抽样; 典型抽样

Abstract: A survey on farm animals storage was an important part of agricultural survey, the mainly survey method was sampling. The objective of the study was to select a suitable sampling method based on an example to estimate the nationwide cow storage. Second-order PPS(sampling with probability proportional to size) sampling,the stratified proportion sampling and the stratified second-order typical sampling were adopted in the survey on beef cattle storage in the Aohan county, Inner Mongolia, compared the accuracies given by the three methods. The results showed that under the optimal sample size for each of the three methods,the order of the three methods according to the relative error was: the stratified second-order typical sampling＜the stratified proportion sampling＜second-order PPS sampling, and the relative error of the stratified second-order typical sampling was less than the stratified proportion sampling and second-order PPS sampling to 60.38 and 92.83 percent respectively, while the order of the confidence interval was:the stratified second-order typical sampling＜the stratified proportion sampling ＜second-order PPS sampling. Overall, the stratified second-order typical sampling gave the highest accuracy,and the relative error was the smallest. Therefore, in actual application,the stratified second-order typical sampling is the most applicable.

Key words: beef cattle storage; stratified sampling; second-order sampling; typical sampling

中图分类号:

S823

刘喜冬;王延晖;高会江;许尚忠;李俊雅. 内蒙古敖汉旗地区基础母牛存栏量调查方案的研究[J]. , 2012, 39(4): 134-138.

LIU Xi-dong;WANG Yan-hui;GAO Hui-jiang;XU Shang-zhong;LI Jun-ya. A Sampling Survey on Elementary Heifers Storage in Aohan Region of Inner Mongolia[J]. , 2012, 39(4): 134-138.

[1]	贾雪纯, 戎艳花, 朱芷葳, 李鹏飞. 全基因组重测序探究晋南牛优势性状的分子基础[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2024, 51(1): 1-10.
[2]	戎艳花, 贾雪纯, 李鹏飞, 田国富, 朱芷葳. 晋南牛遗传结构特征及选择信号分析[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2024, 51(1): 160-171.
[3]	陈少侃, 罗汉鹏, 马烨桦, 刘刚, 王迪, 郝科比, 王雅春, 郭刚. 荷斯坦牛关键奶流速指标筛选及影响因素分析[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2024, 51(1): 212-219.
[4]	张双双, 贾琪, 王丹, 王卓, 柳俭强, 张立春, 戢爽. 绵羊卷曲受体1基因克隆、表达谱与多态性分析[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(12): 4805-4815.
[5]	刘拓, 努热耶·吾斯曼, 臧长江, 成志强, 刘建成, 南冰禹, 李凤鸣, 李云梦, 仇娅琪, 院东, 王永力. 烟酰胺对泌乳期奶牛瘤胃乳酸代谢及其相关酶活力的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(12): 4868-4875.
[6]	李佳伟, 王雅春. 三河牛味蕾和牛舌乳头分布及形态特征研究[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(12): 4917-4924.
[7]	安松岩, 常瑶, 陈群, 吉虹锦, 杜泽, 杨若钰, 许静漪, 马烨桦, 俞英, 王雅春. 荷斯坦牛与娟姗牛体尺性状生长曲线的比较研究[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(12): 4947-4957.
[8]	梁莎莎, 于农淇, 卢瑛, 李厅厅, 鄢胜飞, 黄健, 谭正准, 黄荣春, 李辉, 潘伟军, 覃广胜. 基于GEO数据库筛选与水牛肌内脂肪沉积相关的候选基因及生物信息学分析[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(11): 4359-4369.
[9]	齐云霞, 吴涛, 胡晓苗, 刘伟, 朱洪龙, 韩荣伟, 杨永新, 程广龙, 赵小伟. 茶多酚对围产后期奶牛生产性能、血清生化及抗氧化指标的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(10): 4070-4076.
[10]	王亚芹, 宗俊霖, 张涛, 关伟军. 牛脂肪间充质干细胞的分离培养及分化潜能的研究[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(9): 3530-3540.
[11]	李睿, 张伊阳, 罗雪慧, 周熳琳, 吴绍米, 杨琨, 乔自林. 低氧对牦牛肺动脉平滑肌细胞增殖及氧化应激损伤作用的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(6): 2245-2254.
[12]	徐媛媛, 郑海英, 杨春艳, 邓廷贤, 黄晨茜, 冯超, 陆杏蓉, 段安琴, 莫霞, 马小娅, 尚江华. 抑制BMP/Smad信号通路对水牛卵巢颗粒细胞生长和类固醇激素合成的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(6): 2354-2362.
[13]	肖鹏, 尚江华, 杨春艳, 李孟琪, 段安琴, 马小娅, 冯超, 黄晨茜, 张博, 周金陈, 韦科龙, 郑威, 郑海英. α-亚麻酸对水牛卵巢颗粒细胞体外培养的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(6): 2380-2387.
[14]	王运路, 孟朝轶, 姚一龙, 郭敏, 牛家强, 索朗斯珠, 徐业芬. 牦牛“海绵吸附”bta-miR-146a的lncRNA筛选及靶向验证[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(3): 859-869.
[15]	任建刚, 关鹏, 黄建智, 盛月云, 包铁柱, 马治平, 钱文熙. 饲粮能量水平对安格斯公牛育肥性能及血清生化指标的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(3): 966-976.