北京油鸡剩余采食量与屠宰性能及肉品质的相关性分析

doi:10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2017.09.020

Abstract

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between residual feed intake (RFI) and some production performances including slaughter performance and meat quality. The RFI and production performances from 400 Beijing-You chickens were used to analyze the correlation of these traits. The results showed that the average daily feed intake (ADFI) and the average daily gain(ADG)of male chickens were extremely significantly higher than female ones (P<0.01), while the feed conversion ratio (FCR) was decreased extremely significantly (P<0.01). The percentage of carcass and thigh muscle as well as the redness (a^*) were extremely significantly higher in male chickens than female ones (P<0.01). In male chickens, RFI had positive correlation with FCR, ADFI (P<0.01)and percentage of abdominal fat(P<0.05) and negative correlation with percentage of breast muscle and percentage of thigh muscle(P<0.01). In female chickens, RFI had positive correlation with FCR, ADFI (P<0.01) and ADG (P<0.05), but negative correlation with percentage of thigh muscle (P<0.01). In male chickens, RFI was correlated positively with lightness (L^*) (P<0.01) and chroma (C^*) (P<0.05). While in female chickens, RFI had positive correlation with L^*, yellowness (b^*) (P<0.05), a^* and C^*(P<0.01), but had extremely negative correlation with Hue (H^*) and pH (P<0.01). Therefore, RFI had correlation with some production performances including slaughter performance and meat quality.

Key words: Beijing-You chickens; residual feed intake(RFI); slaughter performance; meat quality; correlation analysis

CLC Number:

S831.2

LIU Jie, WANG Jie, LIU Ran-ran, ZHAO Gui-ping, ZHENG Mai-qing, LI Qing-he, CUI Huan-xian, WEN Jie. A Correlation Analysis Between Residual Feed Intake and Slaughter Performances and Meat Quality of Beijing-You Chicken[J]. , 2017, 44(9): 2675-2681.

References

[1] Lee J. Molecular Basis of Feed Efficiency in Meat-type Chickens[M]. Getd. Libs. Uga.Edu, 2012.
[2] Patience J F.Feed Efficiency in Swine[M].Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2012.
[3] Gunsett F C. Linear index selection to improve traits defined as ratios[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1984, 59(5):1185-1193.
[4] Jr C D. Genetics of efficient feed utilization and national cattle evaluation:A review[J]. Genetics and Molecular Research Gmr, 2004, 4(2):152-165.
[5] Richardson E C, Herd R M. Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle. 2. Synthesis of results following divergent selection[J]. Animal Production Science, 2004, 44(5):431-440.
[6] Gilbert H, Bidanel J P, Billon Y, et al. Correlated responses in sow appetite, residual feed intake, body composition, and reproduction after divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2012, 90(4):1097-1108.
[7] Lefaucheur L, Lebret B, Ecolan P, et al. Muscle characteristics and meat quality traits are affected by divergent selection on residual feed intake in pigs[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2011, 89(4):996-1010.
[8] 农业行业标准.NY/T 33-2004鸡饲养标准[S].2004.
[9] 农业行业标准.NY/T 823-2004家禽生产性能名词术语和度量统计方法[S]. 2004.
[10] Folch J, Lees M, Sloane-Stanley G H. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues[J]. J Biol Chem, 1957, 226(1):497-509.
[11] Berri C, Bihan-Duval L, Debut M, et al. Consequence of muscle hypertrophy on characteristics of pectoralis major muscle and breast meat quality of broiler chickens[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2007, 85(8):2005-2011.
[12] Cai W, Casey D S, Dekkers J C M. Selection response and genetic parameters for residual feed intake in Yorkshire swine[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2008, 86(2):287-298.
[13] Arthur P F, Archer J A, Johnston D J, et al. Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2001, 79(11):2805-2811.
[14] Faure J, Lefaucheur L, Bonhomme N, et al. Consequences of divergent selection for residual feed intake in pigs on muscle energy metabolism and meat quality[J]. Meat Science, 2013, 93(1):37-45.
[15] Aggrey S E, Karnuah A B, Sebastian B, et al. Genetic properties of feed efficiency parameters in meat-type chickens[J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 2010, 42(1):25.
[16] Herd R M, Arthur P F. Physiological basis for residual feed intake[J]. Journal of Animal Science. 2009, 87(Suppl 14):64-71.
[17] Richardson E C, Herd R M, Oddy V H, et al. Body composition and implications for heat production and Angus steer progeny of parents selected for and against residual feed intake[J]. Animal Production Science, 2001, 41(7):1065-1072.
[18] Zhuo Z, Lamont S J, Lee W R, et al. RNA-Seq analysis of abdominal fat reveals differences between modern commercial broiler chickens with high and low feed efficiencies[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(8):e0135810.
[19] Zhou N, Lee W R, Abasht B. Messenger RNA sequencing and pathway analysis provide novel insights into the biological basis of chickens' feed efficiency[J]. BMC Genomics, 2015, 16(1):195.
[20] Young J M, Cai W, Dekkers J C. Effect of selection for residual feed intake on feeding behavior and daily feed intake patterns in Yorkshire swine[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2011, 89(3):639-647.
[21] Nascimento M L, Souza A R, Chaves A S, et al. Feed efficiency indexes and their relationships with carcass, non-carcass and meat quality traits in Nellore steers[J]. Meat Science, 2016, 116:78-85.
[22] Mcdonagh M B, Herd R M, Richardson E C, et al. Meat quality and the calpain system of feedlot steers following a single generation of divergent selection for residual feed intake[J]. Animal Production Science. 2001, 41(7):1013-1021.
[23] Symeon G K, Mantis F, Bizelis I, et al. Effects of caponization on growth performance, carcass composition and meat quality of males of a layer line[J]. Animal, 2012, 6(12):2023-2030.

A Correlation Analysis Between Residual Feed Intake and Slaughter Performances and Meat Quality of Beijing-You Chicken

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LI Yanghui, XU Tao, ZHANG Shuxian, LIU Ke, JIA Tianqing, CHEN Ning, YIN Junliang, XI Linqiao, WANG Dong, ZHOU Xiaoling. Effect of Replacing Wheat Straw with Cumin Straw on Growth Performance, Slaughter Performance and Plasma Biochemical Parameters of Lambs [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(6): 2296-2304.
[2]	LI Mengyuan, LIU Mengqian, KANG Jiajia, HUANG Ying, DUAN Yong, JIA Junjing, GE Changrong, CAO Weina. Effects of Guanidinoacetic Acid on Meat Quality and Abdominal Fat Deposition in Broilers [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(4): 1385-1394.
[3]	ZHANG Rui, MU Chunyu, TANG Qingping, BU Zhu, YANG Mingjun, XIA Aiping, YANG Xiaoming. Polymorphism of GnIH Gene and Its Correlation with Egg-laying Traits in Pigeons [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(4): 1412-1421.
[4]	ZHANG Fangwei, ZHANG Qi, ZHANG Yunpeng, LI Xin, ZHANG Jingbo, ZHANG Shumin, YU Yongsheng. Polymorphism of FOXA2 Gene Exon 3 and Its Association with Reproductive Traits in Songliao Black Pigs [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(4): 1444-1451.
[5]	TAN Yuancheng, LUO Hualun, ZHANG Yiyu, YANG Suan, WANG Yingtong, WANG Chunyuan. Polymorphism of MyoG Gene and Its Association with Body Size and Meat Traits in White Feather King Pigeons [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(4): 1461-1471.
[6]	REN Jiangang, GUAN Peng, HUANG Jianzhi, SHENG Yueyun, BAO Tiezhu, MA Zhiping, QIAN Wenxi. Effects of Dietary Energy Level on Growth-fattening Performance and Serum Biochemical Indices of Angus Bulls [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(3): 966-976.
[7]	XIONG Taidi, JIANG Shouqun, ZHANG Huihua, ZHU Cui. Research Progress on Transportation Stress and Its Mitigation Measures in Poultry [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(3): 977-988.
[8]	LI Bin, SHI Zhengling, ZENG Ziyou, HUANG Yingyan, LI Lin, DU Zilai, JI Yifan, WANG Di, YU Jie, MEI Shaofeng. Effects of Chicory on Growth Performance,Slaughter Traits and Meat Quality of Mahuang Broilers with Different Gender [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 50(2): 500-511.
[9]	YANG Man, LIU Hai, ZHANG Run, HU Ziping, NIU Naiqi, WANG Lixian, ZHANG Longchao. Association Analysis of Polymorphism of MYH3 and MYH13 Genes with Meat Quality Traits in Beijing Black Pigs [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2022, 49(9): 3428-3437.
[10]	ZHANG Shuya, ZHANG Jiqiao, CAI Yingjie, CAO Chang, ZHANG Jianhua, ZHANG Jianqin. Comparison of Meat Quality and Analysis of the Best Listing Date of Lueyang Black-bone Chickens at Different Ages [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2022, 49(6): 2165-2175.
[11]	MA Yanru, YU Yongsheng, CAO Yang, QIN Lihong, ZHAO Yumin, WU Jian. Polymorphism of PDK4 Gene and Its Association with Meat Quality Traits in Chinese Steppe Red Cattle [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2022, 49(6): 2186-2194.
[12]	HU Wen, HUO Konglin, SONG Xingxing, ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Duoni, LUO Rongrong, XU Wenhao, LI Xun. Effects of Gonadotropin Inhibitory Hormone on Gonadal Reproductive Function and Glucose Metabolism in SD Rats [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2022, 49(6): 2239-2249.
[13]	NIU Yujie, ZHENG Xinxia, NIU Junli, ZHANG Wenju, CHEN Ning, LIU Yanfeng. Effects of Different Feeding Levels on Growth Performance,Slaughter Performance and Organ Development of Multiparous Suffolk Rams [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2022, 49(4): 1304-1313.
[14]	RUAN Yong, CHEN Xiang, DAI Lingang, HUANG Jiajin, AN Dongwei, ZOU Qishun. Correlation Analysis of VNN1 Gene Polymorphism and Lambing Number in F3 Generation Boza Goats [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2022, 49(4): 1384-1392.
[15]	FANG Qianhai, CHEN Hongbo, BI Yanzhen. Research Progress on Important Breeding Value Genes and Screening Techniques of Pigs [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2022, 49(3): 992-1004.