腺病毒载体转染水牛不同原代体细胞的效果比较

doi:10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2016.10.022

《中国畜牧兽医》 ›› 2016, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 2661-2665.doi: 10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2016.10.022

腺病毒载体转染水牛不同原代体细胞的效果比较

段安琴, 庞春英, 朱鹏, 陆杏蓉, 邓廷贤, 梁贤威

中国农业科学院广西水牛研究所, 水牛遗传繁育重点实验室, 南宁 530001

收稿日期:2016-03-12 出版日期:2016-10-20 发布日期:2016-10-28
通讯作者: 梁贤威 E-mail:liangbri@126.com
作者简介:段安琴(1988-),女,广西柳州人,硕士生,研究实习员,研究方向:动物生殖生理,E-mail:duanaq321@163.com
基金资助:
农业部转基因重点项目（2014ZX0801012B）；广西自然科学基金重点项目（2014GXNSFDA118017）；广西科技攻关国际交流与合作项目（桂科合14123001-5）；广西水牛研究所基本业务费（1504005）

Effect Comparison of Adenovirus Vector Transfer into Different Buffalo Cells

DUAN An-qin, PANG Chun-ying, ZHU Peng, LU Xing-rong, DENG Ting-xian, LIANG Xian-wei

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Buffalo Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530001, China

Received:2016-03-12 Online:2016-10-20 Published:2016-10-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

试验旨在比较腺病毒载体转染水牛乳腺上皮细胞、卵丘细胞、成纤维细胞的效率。将腺病毒质粒pBHGloxdelE13cre、pDC316-eGFP脂质体转染293细胞，收集病毒并测定病毒滴度。用腺病毒载体按不同的感染复数（MOI）感染水牛乳腺上皮细胞、卵丘细胞、成纤维细胞，72 h后倒置荧光显微镜下观察，统计感染效率。MOI为25、50、100、200、400时，成纤维细胞感染效率分别为0.7%、7.0%、9.0%、12.5%、34.0%，卵丘细胞感染效率分别为42.5%、55.3%、57.4%、76.0%、80.0%，乳腺上皮细胞感染效率分别为88.7%、100%、100%、100%、100%。结果表明，腺病毒转染乳腺上皮效率最佳，卵丘细胞次之，成纤维细胞效果较差。

关键词: 水牛; 腺病毒载体; 乳腺上皮细胞; 卵丘细胞; 成纤维细胞

Abstract:

Buffalo mammary epithelial cell,cumulus cell and fibroblasts were transfected by adenovirus vectors and compared their transfection efficiency.293 cells were transfected with pBHGloxdelE13cre and pDC316-eGFP by liposome,the virus was collected and titer was detected.Buffalo mammary epithelial cell,cumulus cell and fibroblasts were exposed to different multiplicity of infection (MOI) of adenovirus vectors.After 72 h,the cells were observed with inverted fluorescence microscope,and transfection efficiency was calculated.When the MOI was 25,50,100,200 and 400,the transfection efficiency of fibroblasts were 0.7%,7.0%,9.0%,12.5% and 34.0%,the transfection efficiency of cumulus cells were 42.5%,55.3%,57.4%,76.0% and 80.0%,the transfection efficiency of mammary epithelial cells were 88.7%,100%,100%,100% and 100%.The results showed that the transfection efficiency of mammary epithelial cell was the best,followed by cumulus cell,and fibroblast was poor.

Key words: buffalo; adenovirus vector; mammary epithelial cell; cumulus cell; fibroblasts

中图分类号:

S852.6

段安琴, 庞春英, 朱鹏, 陆杏蓉, 邓廷贤, 梁贤威. 腺病毒载体转染水牛不同原代体细胞的效果比较[J]. 《中国畜牧兽医》, 2016, 43(10): 2661-2665.

DUAN An-qin, PANG Chun-ying, ZHU Peng, LU Xing-rong, DENG Ting-xian, LIANG Xian-wei. Effect Comparison of Adenovirus Vector Transfer into Different Buffalo Cells[J]. , 2016, 43(10): 2661-2665.

参考文献

[1] 简保权,秦学敏,龚芳.世界水牛奶业发展现状和典型模式分析[J].世界农业,2015,3:115-118.
[2] Kaushik R,Singh K P,Kumari A,et al.Isolation,characterization,and EGFP expression in the buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) mammary gland epithelial cell line[J].In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology Animal,2013,49(1):1-7.
[3] Jena M K,Janjanam J,Naru J,et al.DIGE based proteome analysis of mammary gland tissue in water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis):Lactating vis-a-vis heifer[J].J Proteomics,2015,119:100-111.
[4] Yadav P,Singh D D,Mukesh M,et al.Expression profiling of glucose transporter 1(GLUT1) and apoptotic genes (BAX and BCL2) in milk enriched mammary epithelial cells (MEC) in riverine buffalo during lactation[J].Animal Biotechnology,2014,25(3):151-159.
[5] Jain A,Jain T,Kumar P,et al.Follicle-stimulating hormone-induced rescue of cumulus cell apoptosis and enhanced development ability of buffalo oocytes[J].Domestic Animal Endocrinology,2016,55:74-82.
[6] Shahid B,Jalali S,Khan M I,et al.Effect of gonadotrophins,oestradiol and insulin on cumulus expansion of Nili Ravi buffalo oocytes[J].Pak J Pharm Sci,2015,28(1):95-101.
[7] Kathirvel M,Soundian E,Kumanan V.Differential expression dynamics of growth differentiation factor9(GDF9) and bone morphogenetic factor15(BMP15) mRNA transcripts during in vitro maturation of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) cumulus-oocyte complexes[J].Springerplus,2013,2(1):206.
[8] 邓廷贤,庞春英,王建,等.水牛分子生物学技术研究新进展[J].中国畜牧兽医,2014,41(4):79-84.
[9] 孙燕,潘红梅,张家骅.水牛胚胎体外生产研究综述[J].中国农学通报,2004,4:17-20.
[10] Huang Z,Wells D.The human oocyte and cumulus cells relationship:New insights from the cumulus cell transcriptome[J].Molecular Human Reproduction,2010,16(10):715-725.
[11] Gilchrist R B,Lane M,Thompson J G.Oocyte-secreted factors:Regulators of cumulus cell function and oocyte quality[J].Hum Reprod Update,2008,14(2):159-177.
[12] Sutton-McDowall M L,Gilchrist R B,Thompson J G.The pivotal role of glucose metabolism in determining oocyte developmental competence[J].Reproduction,2010,139(4):685-695.
[13] Hernandez-Gonzalez I,Gonzalez-Robayna I,Shimada M,et al.Gene expression profiles of cumulus cell oocyte complexes during ovulation reveal cumulus cells express neuronal and immune-related genes:Does this expand their role in the ovulation process[J]. Mol Endocrinol,2006,20(6):1300-1321.
[14] Mehlmann L M.Stops and starts in mammalian oocytes:Recent advances in understanding the regulation of meiotic arrest and oocyte maturation[J].Reproduction,2005,130(6):791-799.
[15] 方佳,郭江辉,杨卫涛,等.腺病毒载体与慢病毒载体介导EGFP基因转染犬骨髓间充质干细胞效果的比较[J].中国兽医科学,2014,44(8):871-875.
[16] 许刚,徐如祥,姜晓丹,等.绿色荧光蛋白基因腺病毒载体转染大鼠骨髓间充质干细胞的实验研究[J].广东医学,2008,29(2):188-190.
[17] 王国鹏,罗凌惠,谢静,等.慢病毒载体和腺病毒载体转染原代培养的螺旋神经节细胞的比较[J].临床耳鼻喉头颈外科杂志,2011,25(4):172-175.
[18] 郑钧丰,魏泓,孔永,等.2种腺病毒介导的eGFP对人成纤维细胞转染效率的研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2008,8(5):839-841.
[19] 孙鹏宇,张艳玲,荆玉明,等.腺病毒滴度不同测定方法比较[J].南方医科大学学报,2011,31(2):234-238.
[20] 马晓生,姜建元,吕飞舟,等.腺病毒和慢病毒载体感染骨髓间充质干细胞的比较[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(47):3340-3344.

腺病毒载体转染水牛不同原代体细胞的效果比较

Effect Comparison of Adenovirus Vector Transfer into Different Buffalo Cells

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐媛媛, 郑海英, 杨春艳, 邓廷贤, 黄晨茜, 冯超, 陆杏蓉, 段安琴, 莫霞, 马小娅, 尚江华. 抑制BMP/Smad信号通路对水牛卵巢颗粒细胞生长和类固醇激素合成的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(6): 2354-2362.
[2]	肖鹏, 尚江华, 杨春艳, 李孟琪, 段安琴, 马小娅, 冯超, 黄晨茜, 张博, 周金陈, 韦科龙, 郑威, 郑海英. α-亚麻酸对水牛卵巢颗粒细胞体外培养的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(6): 2380-2387.
[3]	田书岳, 神英超, 王希生, 王敏, 伊敏娜, 才文道力玛, 陶力, 赵毕力格, 芒来, 格日乐其木格. 蒙古马胎儿成纤维细胞永生化细胞体系建立的研究[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(1): 46-57.
[4]	潘思尧, 张丹丹, 刘权辉, 王国栋, 吕丹薇, 黄奔. 抑制miR-142-3p对奶山羊化学诱导乳腺上皮细胞泌乳功能的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(1): 58-66.
[5]	肖莉, 牛小杰, 刘庆庆, 王月丽, 陈创夫, 易继海. 猪轮状病毒VP4基因重组腺病毒的构建及抗体水平评价[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(1): 260-269.
[6]	唐庆凤, 李玲, 黄加祥, 方文远, 农皓如, 唐艳, 陆呈委, 韦盘秋, 冯玲. 广西地区不同饲养模式及不同季节水牛奶霉菌毒素污染状况调查[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(9): 3665-3675.
[7]	周雅, 张禾垟, 刘琳玲, 李浩东, 郑军军, 王桂武. 梅花鹿成纤维细胞因子受体2基因多态性及其与茸重性状的关联分析[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(8): 3006-3014.
[8]	蔡萌, 朱晓艳, 王梦玲, 刘子豪, 熊本海, 杨亮. 金黄色葡萄球菌处理对奶牛乳腺上皮细胞外泌体表征的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(8): 3091-3098.
[9]	张元锌, 王闫宇, 云艳虹, 陈俊朴, 石惠宇, 王学梅. 山羊乳腺上皮细胞氧化损伤模型的建立[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(5): 1917-1925.
[10]	刘新勇, 谭正准, 李辉, 黄健, 罗华, 曾令湖, 程隽如, 钟华配, 杨春艳, 王晓丽, 覃广胜. 热应激对摩拉和尼里-拉菲水牛血液生化指标的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(2): 521-528.
[11]	田微, 方妍雅, 柳海星, 李钟淑. bFGF对3-硝基丙酸处理的小鼠受精卵体外发育能力的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(2): 608-614.
[12]	董博文, 崔小珍, 白瑞, 郑明学, 张黎, 吕晓玲, 任玉红. EGF和FGF-2对猪皮下脂肪神经嵴干细胞增殖和分化的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(12): 4878-4886.
[13]	徐媛媛, 莫霞, 黄晨茜, 冯超, 陆杏蓉, 马小娅, 杨春艳, 郑海英, 尚江华. 水牛TRAIL基因克隆及生物信息学分析[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(10): 3693-3703.
[14]	梁莎莎, 庞春英, 邓廷贤, 陆杏蓉, 段安琴, 马小娅, 方艳艳, 梁贤威. 水牛MFSD2A基因多态性及其与产奶性状的关联分析[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(10): 3856-3865.
[15]	郑海英, 杨春艳, 李玲玉, 唐丽萍, 郑威, 尚江华. 白藜芦醇对体外培养的水牛卵丘细胞增殖活力及其相关基因mRNA表达的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(1): 208-215.