不同代乳品及饲喂方式对荷斯坦奶公犊生产犊牛白肉影响的研究

doi:10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2015.08.015

›› 2015, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 2020-2027.doi: 10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2015.08.015

不同代乳品及饲喂方式对荷斯坦奶公犊生产犊牛白肉影响的研究

王晓玲¹, 李秋凤¹, 曹玉凤¹, 高艳霞¹, 于春起², 杜柳柳¹, 李晓蒙¹, 李建国¹

1. 河北农业大学动物科技学院, 保定 071001;
2. 河北福成五丰食品股份有限公司, 三河 065200

收稿日期:2015-02-09 出版日期:2015-08-20 发布日期:2015-08-27
通讯作者: 曹玉凤 E-mail:cyf278@sohu.com
作者简介:王晓玲(1989-),女,河北邢台人,硕士,研究方向:反刍动物营养,E-mail:wanglingdang163@163.com
基金资助:
国家现代农业(肉牛)产业技术体系建设专项资金(CARS-38)

Study on Production of White Veal with Holstein Bull Calves Fed on Different Milk Replacer and Feeding Methods

WANG Xiao-ling¹, LI Qiu-feng¹, CAO Yu-feng¹, GAO Yan-xia¹, YU Chun-qi², DU Liu-liu¹, LI Xiao-meng¹, LI Jian-guo¹

1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China;
2. Fucheng Wufeng Food Limited Company, Sanhe 065200, China

Received:2015-02-09 Online:2015-08-20 Published:2015-08-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究代乳粉(主要含乳类制品)液态饲喂和代乳料(主要含植物类饲料等)干喂对荷斯坦奶公犊生产犊牛白肉的影响,试验选用20头健康无病、体重和出生日期相近的荷斯坦奶公犊,随机分为2组,每组10头,进行了120 d的生长育肥试验。Ⅰ组饲喂市售的代乳粉(粗蛋白质22%,粗脂肪16%);Ⅱ组饲喂配制的代乳料(粗蛋白质22%,消化能16 MJ/kg)。结果表明:①Ⅱ组犊牛0~90 d平均日增重高于Ⅰ组犊牛,91~120 d平均日增重显著低于Ⅰ组犊牛(P< 0.05),但两组犊牛0~120 d平均日增重和试验末重均无显著差异(P> 0.05)。②不同代乳品及饲喂方式对奶公犊营养物质表观消化率均无显著影响(P> 0.05)。③Ⅰ组犊牛的胴体重、屠宰率和眼肌面积均显著高于Ⅱ组犊牛(P< 0.05),分别比Ⅱ组高11.88%、11.04%和8.12%,但两组间的胴体产肉率无显著差异(P> 0.05);两组犊牛背最长肌的pH、剪切力、蒸煮损失和肉色均无显著差异(P> 0.05),但Ⅰ组犊牛的失水率比Ⅱ组犊牛高20.83%(P< 0.01);Ⅰ组犊牛背最长肌中粗脂肪含量极显著高于Ⅱ组犊牛(P< 0.01),但两组犊牛背最长肌中水分、粗蛋白质、粗灰分、钙、磷和铁的含量均无显著差异(P> 0.05)。④Ⅱ组犊牛的饲养成本比Ⅰ组降低45.38%。综上所述,饲喂代乳料的犊牛可获得与饲喂代乳粉犊牛相似的生长性能和肉品质,显著降低饲养成本。

关键词: 荷斯坦奶公犊; 犊牛白肉; 代乳料; 生长肥育性能; 屠宰性能; 肉品质

Abstract: The objective of this experiment was to study the effects of production of white veal with Holstein bull calves fed on the liquid milk replacer (containing mainly dairy products) feeding and the dry milk replacer (containing mainly plant diet, etc)feeding.20 healthy male calves with similar birth date and body weight were selected, and randomly divided into two groups (10 calves per group), for a period of 120 d white beef production fattening test.GroupⅠfed with milk replacer (commercial, 22% CP, 16% EE), groupⅡ fed with milk replacer (formulated, 22% CP, 16 MJ/kg DE).The results showed as follows:① 0 to 90 d ADG of group Ⅱ were higher than groupⅠ, 91 to 120 d ADG of group Ⅱ were significantly lower than groupⅠ (P< 0.05), but there were no significant differences in 0 to 120 d ADG and 120 d weight between two groups (P> 0.05).② There were no significant differences in the nutrient apparent digestibility of Holstein bull calves with different milk replacer and feeding methods (P> 0.05).③ Carcass weight, dressing percentage and eye muscle area of groupⅠcalves were significantly higher than those of group Ⅱ (P< 0.05), increased by 11.88%, 11.04% and 8.12%, respectively, but there was no significant difference in carcass meat production rate between two groups (P> 0.05).There was no significant differences in pH, shear force, cooking lose and meat color of longissimus between two groups (P> 0.05), but compared with group Ⅱ, the water lose rate of groupⅠincreased by 20.83% (P< 0.01).The content of EE of groupⅠwas significantly higher than group Ⅱ (P< 0.01), but there were no significant differences in the contents of moisture, CP, Ash, Ca, P and Fe of longissimus between two groups (P> 0.05).④Compared with groupⅠ, the feed cost of group Ⅱ was reduced by 45.38%.In summary, the growth performance and meat quality of two groups calves were similar, feeding cost was reduced significantly.

Key words: Holstein bull calves; white veal; milk replacer; growth and fattening performance; slaughter performance; meat quality

中图分类号:

S823

王晓玲, 李秋凤, 曹玉凤, 高艳霞, 于春起, 杜柳柳, 李晓蒙, 李建国. 不同代乳品及饲喂方式对荷斯坦奶公犊生产犊牛白肉影响的研究[J]. , 2015, 42(8): 2020-2027.

WANG Xiao-ling, LI Qiu-feng, CAO Yu-feng, GAO Yan-xia, YU Chun-qi, DU Liu-liu, LI Xiao-meng, LI Jian-guo. Study on Production of White Veal with Holstein Bull Calves Fed on Different Milk Replacer and Feeding Methods[J]. , 2015, 42(8): 2020-2027.

参考文献

[1] 曲永利.利用全乳饲喂奶公犊牛生产小白牛肉的研究[J].黑龙江八一农垦大学学报,2009,21(6):25-28.
[2] Bakar C A,Salleh R M,Shafit H M.Effect of milk diets on growth performance and carcass composition as veal from Sahiwal-Friesian calves[J].Journal of Tropical Agriculture and Food Science,2001,29:247-251.
[3] 杨再俊,李胜利,邓磊,等.饲喂全乳和代乳料对小白牛生长性能和胴体性状的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2010,46:31-33.
[4] Hill T M,Bateman H G,Aldrich J M,et al.Effect of using wheat gluten and rich protein concentrate in dairy calf milk replacers[J].The Professional Animal Scientist,2008,24:465-472.
[5] Brscic M,Prevedello P,Stefanit A L,et al.Effects of the provision of solid feeds enriched with protein or nonprotein nitrogen on veal calf growth,welfare,and slaughter performance[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2014,97(7):4649-4657.
[6] Webb L E,Bokkers E A M,Engel B,et al.Behaviour and welfare of veal fed different amounts of solid feed supplemented to a milk replacer ration adjusted for similar growth[J].Applied Animal Behaviour Science,2012,136(2):108-116.
[7] 乌日娜,王小林,周春立,等.小白牛肉规模化生产初探[J].中国畜牧杂志,2006,41(7):48-50.
[8] 李辉,刁其玉,张乃锋,等.不同蛋白质来源对早期断奶犊牛消化及血清生化指标的影响(一)[J].动物营养学报,2009,21(1):47-52.
[9] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].第3版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007.
[10] 中华人民共和国国家标准.GB/T 23742—2009 饲料中盐酸不溶灰分的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
[11] Cozzi G,Gottardo F,Mattiello S,et al.The provision of solid feeds to veal calves:Ⅰ.Growth performance,forestomach development,and carcass and meat quality[J].Journal of Animal Science,2002,80(2):357-366.
[12] 林传星,张晓鸣.大豆蛋白的应用研究进展[J].江西饲料,2014,5:7-9.
[13] Montagne L,Crévieu-Gabriel I,Toullec R,et al.Influence of dietary protein level and source on the course of protein digestion along the small intestine of the veal calf[J].Journal of Animal Science,2003,86(3):934-943.
[14] 许贵善,刁其玉,纪守坤,等.不同饲喂水平对肉用绵羊生长性能、屠宰性能及器官指数的影响[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(5):953-960.
[15] 王永超.日粮组成对奶公犊牛生长性能、营养物质消化代谢及肉品质的影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2013.
[16] 张保云,罗玉柱,王继卿,等.不同代乳品及饲喂方式下荷斯坦公犊牛生产小牛肉的效果分析[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2010,45(6):23-27.
[17] Berends H,Van Reenen C G,Stockhofe-Zurwieden N,et al.Effects of rumen development and solid feed composition on growth performance and abomasal health in veal calves[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2012,95(6):3190-3199.
[18] 张辉,宋云鹏,李鹏,等.吉林西门塔尔肉牛肌内脂肪与日粮能量水平的研究[J].饲料研究,2010,12:7-8.

不同代乳品及饲喂方式对荷斯坦奶公犊生产犊牛白肉影响的研究

Study on Production of White Veal with Holstein Bull Calves Fed on Different Milk Replacer and Feeding Methods

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李杨辉, 许涛, 张淑贤, 刘珂, 贾天晴, 陈宁, 尹君亮, 席琳乔, 王栋, 周小玲. 孜然秸秆替代小麦秸秆对羔羊生长和屠宰性能及血浆生化指标的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(6): 2296-2304.
[2]	李梦媛, 刘梦潜, 康佳佳, 黄英, 段勇, 贾俊静, 葛长荣, 曹玮娜. 胍基乙酸对肉鸡肉品质和腹脂沉积的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(4): 1385-1394.
[3]	任建刚, 关鹏, 黄建智, 盛月云, 包铁柱, 马治平, 钱文熙. 饲粮能量水平对安格斯公牛育肥性能及血清生化指标的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(3): 966-976.
[4]	熊太第, 蒋守群, 张辉华, 朱翠. 家禽运输应激及其缓解措施研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(3): 977-988.
[5]	李彬, 史正玲, 曾子悠, 黄颖妍, 李林, 杜自来, 纪一凡, 王迪, 虞洁, 梅绍锋. 菊苣对不同性别麻黄肉鸡生长性能、屠宰性能和肉品质的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(2): 500-511.
[6]	李明博, 高青山, 李官浩, 张魁, 崔莲花, 侯丽娜. 中草药饲料添加剂对延边黄牛肉品质与风味物质的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(2): 531-542.
[7]	张淑雅, 张纪桥, 蔡瑛婕, 曹敞, 张建华, 张建勤. 不同日龄略阳乌鸡肉品质对比与最佳上市日龄分析[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(6): 2165-2175.
[8]	牛玉杰, 郑新霞, 牛俊丽, 张文举, 陈宁, 刘艳丰. 不同饲喂水平对多胎萨福克公羊生长性能、屠宰性能和器官发育的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(4): 1304-1313.
[9]	宋琼莉, 宋文静, 陈小连, 韦启鹏, 谢金防, 邹志恒, 刘林秀, 熊平文. 饲粮代谢能水平对宁都黄鸡生长性能、屠宰性能和血液生化指标的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(2): 539-547.
[10]	刘小平, 史卓言, 冀祥, 楚潇然, 侯俊杰, 宋祯, 李晓霞, 杨又兵, 张古栾, 王建平, 文凤云. 不同屠宰活重豫西黑猪的营养成分及肉质特性分析[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(10): 3771-3781.
[11]	孙颢轩, 刘国华, 蔡辉益, 陈志敏. 饲喂发酵饲料对肉鸡生长性能、养分利用率、肠道健康和肉品质的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(10): 3782-3790.
[12]	陶勇, 任善茂, 宋颜颜, 董晓君, 赵旭庭. 复合植物提取物对育肥期苏姜猪胴体性状、肌肉品质及血清指标的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(1): 161-168.
[13]	王一冰, 邝智祥, 张盛, 苟钟勇, 林厦菁, 蒋守群. 3种添加剂对91~115日龄清远麻鸡生长性能、抗氧化性能和肉品质的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2021, 48(8): 2787-2796.
[14]	张杏艳, 蓝海恩, 谢炳坤, 潘天彪, 陈宝剑, 关志惠, 陈中华. 性别对杜陆猪肉品质及风味影响的代谢组学分析[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2021, 48(10): 3585-3594.
[15]	毛亚芳, 周振波, 杜红岩, 杜庆鑫, 杨改青, 王林枫, 付彤, 廉红霞, 高腾云, 王福州, 陈奕霏. 杜仲叶粉对绿壳蛋鸡蛋品质、血清生化指标、屠宰性能及肉质性状的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2021, 48(1): 161-171.