1 杨春艳,庞春英,李日聪,等. 水牛徒手克隆的初步研究[J]. 中国畜牧兽医,2011,4:147~150.
2 Ali J, Shelton J N. Design of vitrification solutions for the cryopreservation of embryos. J Reprod Fertil,1993,99: 471~477.
3 Lagutina I, Lazzari G, Duchi R, et al. Comparative aspects of somatic cell nuclear transfer with conventional and zona-free method in cattle, horse, pig and sheep. Theriogenology,2007,67: 90~98.
4 Saikhun J, Kitiyanant N, Songtaveesin C, et al. Development of swamp buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos after parthenogenetic activation and nuclear transfer using serum fed or starved fetal fibroblasts. Repord Nutr Dev,2004,44: 65~78.
5 Shah R A, George A, Singh M K, et al. Hand-made cloned buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos: Comparison of different media and culture systems.Cloning Stem Cells,2008,10:435~442.
6 Vajta G, Hyttel P, Callensen H. Morphological changes of in vitro produced bovine blastocysts after vitrification, in-straw direct rehydration, and culture. Mol Reprod Dev,1997,48: 9~17.
7 Vajta G, Peura T T, Holm P, et al. New method for culture of zona-included or zona-free embryos: The well of the well (WOW) system. Mol Reprod,2000,55: 256~264.
8 Vajta G, Lewis I M, Hyttel P, et al. Somatic cell cloning without micromanipulators. Cloning,2001,3: 89~95.
9 Vajta G, Lewis I M, Trounson A O, et al. Handmade somatic cell cloning in cattle: Analysis of factors contributing to high efficiency in vitro. Biol Reprod,2003,68: 571~578.
10 Vajta G, Kragh P M, Mtango N R. Handmade cloning approach: potentials and limitations. Reprod Fertil Dev,2005,17: 97~112.
11 Westhusin M, Collas P, Marek D, et al. Reducing the amount of cytoplasm available for early embryonic development decreases the quality but not quantity of embryos produced by in vitro fertilisation and nuclear transplantation. Theriogenology,1996,46: 243~252.
12 Yang C Y, Li R C, Pang C Y, et al. Study on the inter-subspecies nuclear transfer of river buffalo somatic cell nuclei into swamp buffalo oocyte cytoplasm. Anim Reprod Sci,2010,121:78~83. |