填饲时间对北京鸭生长性能、屠宰性能、营养品质和肠道形态的影响

doi:10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2025.06.012

Abstract

Abstract: 【Objective】 This study aimed to investigate the optimal overfeeding time for Pekin ducks and investigate the effects of different overfeeding times on the growth performance,slaughter performance,nutritional quality and intestinal morphology.【Method】 150 1-day-old Pekin ducks with similar body weights were randomly divided into five groups using a single factor randomized experimental design.Each group consisted of 6 replicates,with 5 Pekin ducks in each replicate.The latter 7,5,3 and 1 d of the fattening period (36-42 days old) were overfed four times per one day,being force-fed for 1 (OF1 group),3 (OF3 group),5 (OF5 group)and 7 days(OF7 group),respectively and the OF0 group was the control group without overfeeding.The experimental period was 42 days.After the experiment,the Pekin ducks were weighed and their production performance was calculated.Two Pekin ducks were selected from each replicate group for slaughter and their slaughter performance was measured.The sebum and pectoral muscle tissues of Pekin ducks were collected for the detection of fatty acid and amino acid content,respectively.Duodenal,jejunal,and ileal tissues of Pekin ducks were collected for histopathological sectioning.【Result】 ①Compared with OF0 group,the final weight and average daily gain of Pekin ducks in OF3,OF5 and OF7 groups were significantly higher (P＜0.05),and the feed-to-weight ratio in OF7 group was significantly higher (P<0.05).②Compared with OF0 group,the slaughter rate,percentage of eviscerated yield,leg muscle weight (rate) and breast muscle weight (rate) of Pekin ducks in the four overfeeding groups were all not significant (P＞0.05),but the live weight,dressing weight and sebum weight (rate) of Pekin ducks in OF3,OF5,and OF7 groups were all significantly higher (P＜0.05).③ Compared with OF0 group,the contents of total fatty acids (TFA),saturated fatty acids (SFA),monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA),polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA),n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA),and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-6 PUFA) in the skin fat of Pekin ducks in OF1 group were significantly reduced (P＜0.05),while the contents of TFA and MUFA in the skin fat of Pekin ducks in OF3 and OF5 groups were significantly increased (P＜0.05),and the content of SFA in the skin fat of Pekin ducks in OF5 and OF7 groups was significantly increased (P＜0.05),the contents of PUFA,n-3 PUFA,and n-6 PUFA in the skin fat of Pekin ducks in OF3 group were significantly increased (P＜0.05),and the n-6/n-3 ratio showed no significant difference (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the content of total amino acids (TAA) in the pectoral muscle tissue of Pekin ducks (P＞0.05),but the content of essential amino acids (EAA) in the pectoral muscle tissue of Pekin ducks in OF7 group was significantly reduced (P＜0.05).④ Compared with OF0 group,overfeeding could lead to different degrees of shedding,inflammatory cell infiltration and even necrosis of the villous structure in small intestine of Pekin duck.【Conclusion】 Overfeeding could significantly improve growth performance,slaughter performance and sebum nutrient content of Pekin ducks,but it would damage the intestinal morphology and structure.Thus the optimal overfeeding time was recommended to be 3 days for comprehensive consideration.

Key words: overfeeding; Pekin ducks; growth performance; slaughtering performance; intestinal morphology

CLC Number:

S815.2

LYU Xueze, REN Haiyuan, WANG Liang, XIE Shiyong, YANG Weifang, LIU Jun, WU Shugeng, WU Dimei, LIU Yanhan. Effects of Overfeeding Time on Growth Performance,Slaughter Performance, Nutritional Quality and Intestinal Morphology of Pekin Ducks[J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 52(6): 2582-2591.

References

[1] 李姝楠，刘大鹏，李智楠，等.北京鸭和连城白鸭腿肌肉品质及感官评价差异研究[J].中国畜牧兽医,2024，51(9):3939-3947.LI S N,LIU D P,LI Z N,et al.Differences in leg muscle quality and sensory evaluation between Peking duck and Liancheng White duck[J].China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine,2024,51(9):3939-3947.(in Chinese)
[2] 付建全.不同饲养方式对北京鸭生长性能、抗氧化、肉品质及成本的影响[J].中国饲料，2021，20:9-12.FU J Q.Effects of different feeding methods on growth performance,anti-oxidation,meat quality and cost of Peking ducks[J].China Feed，2021，20:9-12.(in Chinese)
[3] 谢实勇，王莹，吴迪梅，等.起始填饲量对北京鸭屠宰性能的影响[J].中国畜牧业,2024,4:47-48.XIE S Y,WANG Y,WU D M，et al.The effect of initial feeding amount on slaughter performance of Beijing ducks[J].China Animal Industry, 2024,4:47-48.(in Chinese)
[4] 闻治国，杨培龙，陈余，等.复合酶制剂对北京填鸭胴体性状、体脂沉积和营养物质表观消化率的影响[J].动物营养学报，2017，29(7):2366-2373.WEN Z G,YANG P L,CHEN Y,et al.Effects of compound enzyme preparation on carcass traits,body fat deposition and apparent digestibility of nutrients in Peking ducks[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2017,29(7):2366-2373.(in Chinese)
[5] 闻治国，朱勇文，唐静，等.不同填饲量对北京鸭胴体品质、体脂沉积和营养物质表观消化率的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报，2012，43(8):1247-1254.WEN Z G,ZHU Y W,TANG J,et al.Effects of force-feeding levels on carcass quality,body fat deposition and apparent digestibility of nutrients for Pekin ducks[J].Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica,2012,43(8):1247-1254.(in Chinese)
[6] CHARTRIN P,BERNADET M,GUY G,et al.Does overfeeding enhance genotype effects on liver ability for lipogenesis and lipid secretion in ducks?[J].Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A-Molecular & Integrative Physiology,2006,145(3):390-396.
[7] JAMROZ D,JAKOBSEN K,ORDA J,et al.Development of the gastrointestinal tract and digestibility of dietary fibre and amino acids in young chickens,ducks and geese fed diets with high amounts of barley[J].Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A-Molecular & Integrative Physiology,2001,130(4):643-652.
[8] 刘砚涵,黄丽卿,张建伟,等.丁酸梭菌对填饲北京鸭生长性能、免疫功能及血液抗氧化能力的影响[J].中国家禽,2019,41(10):31-35.LIU Y H,HUANG L Q,ZHANG J W,et al.Effects of Clostridium butyricum on growth performance,immune function and serum antioxidative capacity of force-feeding Pekin ducks[J].China Poultry,2019,41(10):31-35.(in Chinese)
[9] 韩燕云,陈瑶,何金武,等.不同饲喂方式对北京填鸭生产性能及胴体品质影响[J].水禽世界,2014,1:28-29.HAN Y Y,CHEN Y,HE J W,et al.The impact of different feeding methods on the production performance and carcass quality of Beijing ducks[J].Waterbird World,2014,1:28-29.(in Chinese)
[10] 中华人民共和国农业部.肉鸭饲养标准:NY/T 2122—2012[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2012.CHINA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS.Meat duck feeding standard:NY/T 2122—2012[S].Beijing:China Agricultural Press,2012.(in Chinese)
[11] 北京市市场监督管理局.北京鸭第1部分：商品鸭养殖技术规范:DB11/T 012.1—2023[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2023.BEIJING MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION FOR MARKET REGULATION.Peking Duck Part 1:Technical specification for farming commercial duck:DB11/T 012.1—2023[S].Beijing:China Agricultural Press,2023.(in Chinese)
[12] 中华人民共和国农业农村部.家禽生产性能名词术语和度量统计方法：NY/T 823—2020[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2020.CHINA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS.Performance ferms and measurement for poultry:NY/T 823—2020[S].Beijing:China Agricultural Press,2020.(in Chinese)
[13] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会，国家食品药品监督管理总局.食品安全国家标准食品中脂肪酸的测定:GB 5009.168—2016[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2016.NATIONAL HEALTH AND FAMILY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA，CHINA FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION.National standard for food safety determination of fatty acids in foods:GB 5009.168—2016[S].Beijing:China Agricultural Press,2016.(in Chinese)
[14] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会，国家食品药品监督管理总局.食品安全国家标准食品中氨基酸的测定:GB 5009.124—2016[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2016.NATIONAL HEALTH AND FAMILY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA，CHINA FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION.National standard for food safety determination of amino acids in foods:GB 5009.124—2016[S].Beijing:China Agricultural Press,2016.(in Chinese)
[15] 罗招运.日粮中添加不同糖填饲对天府肉鹅肉品质的影响[D].雅安：四川农业大学,2022.LUO Z Y.Effects of overfeeding dietary supplemental with different sugars on meat quality in Tianfu meat goose[D].Ya’an:Sichuan Agricultural University,2022.(in Chinese)
[16] NIR I,SHAPIRA N,NITSAN Z,et al.Force-feeding effects on growth,carcass and blood composition in the young chick[J].British Journal of Nutrition,1974,32(2):229-239.
[17] HERAULT,HOUEE-BIGOT M,BAEZA E,et al.RNA-Seq analysis of hepatic gene expression of common Pekin,Muscovy,mule and hinny ducks fed ad libitum or overfed[J].BMC Genomics，2019，20(1):13-25.
[18] TAVERNIER A,DAVAIL S,RICAUD K,et al.Genes involved in the establishment of hepatic steatosis in Muscovy,Pekin and mule ducks[J].Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry,2017,424(1-2):147-161.
[19] 韩雪，李美娟，代国滔，等.饲粮表观代谢能水平对1～28日龄三穗鸭生长性能、屠宰性能及血浆生化指标的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2024,51(3):1069-1076.HAN X,LI M J,DAI G T,et al.Effects of dietary AME level on growth performance,slaughter performance and plasma biochemical indices of Sansui ducks aged 1 to 28 days[J].China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine,2024,51(3):1069-1076.(in Chinese)
[20] 闻治国，谢明，黄苇，等.不同填饲量对骡鸭生产性能、胴体品质和体脂沉积的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2013,44(3):419-426.WEN Z G,XIE M,HUANG W,et al.Effects of different force-feeding amounts on growth performance,carcass quality and body fat deposition for mule ducks[J].Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica,2013,44(3):419-426.(in Chinese)
[21] 王健，朱振鹏，董飚，等.填饲对黑羽番鸭产肝性能、组织营养成分、肝脏组织学及脂调控基因表达水平的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2014,37(6):149-154.WANG J,ZHU Z P,DONG B,et al.Measurement of liver performance,nutrient composition,histology and adipogenic genes transcriptional expression of Black Muscovy ducks in response to overfeeding[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University,2014,37(6):149-154.(in Chinese)
[22] 闻治国.填饲对北京鸭脂肪沉积和营养物质表观消化率的影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2012.WEN Z G.The effect of overfeeding on fat deposition and apparent digestibility of nutrients for White Pekin ducks[D].Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,2012.(in Chinese)
[23] 庄蕾，赵子涛，吴永保，等.填饲对北京鸭生长发育、胸肌生化指标和肉品质的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2023,50(8):3093-3101.ZHUANG L,ZHAO Z T,WU Y B,et al.Effects of overfeeding on growth and development,biochemical indexes,and meat quality of breast muscle in Pekin ducks[J].China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine,2023,50(8):3093-3101.(in Chinese)
[24] 齐东东.番鸭与北京鸭肉品质比较及肉质相关基因表达分析[D].合肥：安徽农业大学,2022.QI D D.Comparison of meat quality and analysis of the expression of its related genes between Muscovy duck and Peking duck[D].Hefei:Anhui Agricultural University,2022.(in Chinese)
[25] RANEA-ROBLES P,LUND J，CLEMMENSEN C.The physiology of experimental overfeeding in animals[J].Molecular Metabolism,2022,64:101573.
[26] NITSAN Z,DROR Y,NIR I,et al.The effects of force-feeding on enzymes of the liver,kidney,pancreas and digestive tract of chicks[J].British Journal of Nutrition,1974,32(2):241-247.
[27] 朱心怡.填饲对北京鸭十二指肠和空肠黏膜的屏障功能及氧化应激的影响[D].北京：中国农业大学,2017.ZHU X Y.The effects of force-feeding on duodenal and jejunal mucous barrier function and oxidative stress in Pekin ducks[D].Beijing:China Agricultural University,2017.(in Chinese)
[28] VASAI F,BRUGIRARD R K,BERNADET M D,et al.Overfeeding and genetics affect the composition of intestinal microbiota in Anas platyrhynchos (Pekin) and Cairina moschata (Muscovy) ducks[J].FEMS Microbiology Ecology，2014，87(1):204-216.
[29] LIU Y H,ZHU X Y,HUANG L Q,et al.Effects of force-feeding on immunology,digestive function and oxidative stress in the duodenal and jejunal mucosa of Pekin ducks[J].Animal,2019,13(10):2199-2206.
[30] NIR I,NITSAN Z,DROR Y,et al.Influence of overfeeding on growth,obesity and intestinal tract in young chicks of light and heavy breeds[J].British Journal of Nutrition,1978,39(1):27-35.

Effects of Overfeeding Time on Growth Performance,Slaughter Performance, Nutritional Quality and Intestinal Morphology of Pekin Ducks

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHOU Lusong, ZHAO Yuanyuan, YANG Yuwei, ZHAO Qingyu, MA Qing, TANG Chaohua, ZHANG Huiyan, ZHANG Junmin, QIN Yang, QIN Yuchang. Effects of Sophora alopecuroides and Alkaloids from Sophora alopecuroides on Growth Performance and Rumen Microbiota of Tan Sheep [J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 52(6): 2540-2551.
[2]	ZHANG Guanfeng, SONG Xianfan, YAN Zhaoming, YANG Xiaojin, ZHENG Mengli, LIU Yating, CHEN Qinghua. Effects of Dietary Superoxide Dismutase Supplementation on Growth Performance, Immune Performance,Antioxidant Capacity and Intestinal Function of Broilers [J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 52(5): 1987-1998.
[3]	YU Miao, LI Yanjiao, ZHAO Yanling, CHAO Zhe, WANG Feng, LI Menghan, JIANG Zhiqiang, ZHANG Ting, XUE Xinyu, REN Zili, SUN Ruiping. Effects of Weaning Stress on Intestinal Morphology, Antioxidant Capacity and Nrf2 Signaling Pathway of Wuzhishan Piglets [J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 52(5): 2045-2055.
[4]	ZHAO Na, WANG Lizhong, ZHU Lianying, CAI Yumei, LI Shuang, LI Chenghui. Effects of Chestnut Bur Aqueous Extracts on Growth Performance,Organ Coefficient,Antioxidant Function and Tissue Structure in Mice [J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 52(5): 2056-2065.
[5]	ZHONG Min, YANG Xiaopei, LIU Ruiping, SONG Wenjing, ZHONG Yunping. Effect of Dietary Andrographis paniculata Extract Supplementation on the Growth Performance,Serum Biochemistries,and Gut Health in Ningdu Yellow Chickens [J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 52(5): 2115-2127.
[6]	BIAN Zhiyao, LIU Guohua, HAN Shuaijuan, CHEN Zhimin, ZHENG Aijuan. Effect of Dietary Probiotics Supplementation on Growth Performance, Slaughter Performance,Immune Organ Index and Apparent Metabolic Rate of Nutrients in Broilers [J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 52(5): 2140-2148.
[7]	LI Xiaoyin, LIU Meng, WU Xinxue, LUO Fan, GAO Yanhua. Effects of β-defensin yTAP on Intestinal Morphology and Microbiota Diversity in Mice [J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 52(5): 2379-2391.
[8]	ZHANG Zhengfei, TANG Anxing, SUN Jindong, FU Lixiang, WANG Xingxian, ZHANG Shiyun, YANG Liangyu, NIU Guoyi, TAO Linli. Study on the Appropriate Dietary Crude Protein Level of Yanjin Black-bone Chickens [J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 52(4): 1543-1553.
[9]	LAI Qiushuang, LI Lingshuo, LI Shuyi, TIAN Wei, YU Qingting, ZHANG Kanglin, LI Depeng, LIU Jun, JIANG Fei, PENG Zhongli, WU Jianping, HUANG Yanling. Effects of Rumen-protected Methionine Supplementation in Diets with Different Protein Levels on Growth Performance,Rumen Fermentation and Apparent Digestibility of Nutrients in Yaks [J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 52(4): 1567-1578.
[10]	OU Jiancun, HUANG Jian, QIU Ting, CEN Mingzhu, ZHENG Chaojun, WANG Wenhe, HUANG Weilong, ZHANG Huihua. Effects of 7 Essential Amino Acids Balanced Low Protein Diet on Growth, Nutrient Digestion and Intestinal Tissue Morphology of Qingyuan Partridge Chickens at 31 to 60 Days of Age [J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 52(3): 1102-1112.
[11]	FAN Qiuli, TAO Zhengguo, LI Hui, GOU Zhongyong, WANG Yibing, LIN Xiajing, YE Jinling, JIANG Shouqun. Effects of α-mangostin on Growth Performance,Immune Function, Antioxidant Capacity and Detoxification Function of Broilers [J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 52(3): 1123-1130.
[12]	HUANG Xuan, MA Yuyong, LIU Yang, LI Chuang, JIANG Guitao, ZHANG Xu, DENG Ping, WAN Weican, HE Xu, DAI Qiuzhong. Feeding Effects of Granular Alfalfa and Fresh Pasture Partially Replacing Complete Feed on Linwu Ducks [J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 52(3): 1159-1165.
[13]	DONG Liyue, FAN Zuokun, TANG Meihui, TANG Jianqiang, YU Hailiang, ZHANG Tao, ZHANG Genxi, XIE Kaizhou, ZHAO Zhenhua, DAI Guojun. Effect of Eimeria tenella on Growth Performance,Immune Organs and Intestinal Morphology of Yellow-feathered Broilers [J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 52(3): 1263-1271.
[14]	XU Tong, WANG Ning, GUO Yanhong, WANG Qimeng, CAO Junting, WU Yongbao, ZHOU Zhengkui, WEN Zhiguo, HOU Shuisheng. Effects of Dietary Non-starch Polysaccharide Enzyme Supplementation on Growth Performance,Slaughter Performance,Nutrient Metabolizability,and Nitrogen Emission in Meat Ducks Reared in Three-dimensional Cages [J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 52(2): 605-614.
[15]	YANG Xinshuo, CHANG Danyi, XU Dandan, ZHANG Haihua, MA Qiugang, HUANG Shimeng. Advances in the Impact of Tryptophan and Its Bacterial Metabolites on Intestinal Barrier Function and Growth Performance in Livestock and Poultry [J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2025, 52(2): 636-644.