奶牛场厌氧发酵牛粪生产垫料工艺中菌群变化的研究

doi:10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2024.09.045

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】探究奶牛场粪污厌氧发酵生产垫料工艺过程中菌群的变化，为奶牛场牛粪垫料标准化生产和合理安全使用提供理论参考。【方法】采集4个规模化奶牛场中粪污厌氧发酵前牛粪、厌氧发酵固液分离后的牛粪及牛卧床上的牛粪垫料，提取菌体DNA进行16S rRNA高通量测序，对于不同阶段的微生物多样性、菌群组成及显著差异的特征菌群进行分析。【结果】与发酵前牛粪相比，经过厌氧发酵固液分离后的牛粪中菌群多样性和丰富度均降低，但与牛粪垫料菌群多样性和丰度相似。发酵前牛粪中丰度最高的菌门和菌属分别为厚壁菌门(Firmicutes，55.15%)和瘤胃菌科UCG-005菌属(UCG-005，16.68%)，厌氧发酵固液分离后牛粪中丰度最高的菌门和菌属分别为厚壁菌门(48.12%)和芽孢杆菌属(Bacillus，12.16%)，牛粪垫料中丰度最高的菌门和菌属分别为放线菌门(Actinobacteriota，37.02%)和谷氨酸杆菌(Glutamicibacter，11.65%)。通过LEfSe分析发现，发酵前牛粪、厌氧发酵固液分离后牛粪及垫料3组间存在显著差异的菌属共有14种。【结论】通过对奶牛场厌氧发酵牛粪生产垫料过程中菌群组成的研究，发现优势菌门和菌属均发生了较大改变，发酵处理后菌群多样性和丰富度均降低，该种生产工艺完全满足奶牛场对牛粪垫料安全性的需要。

关键词: 牛粪; 垫料; 16S rRNA; 细菌群落; 厌氧发酵

Abstract: 【Objective】 The changes of bacterial flora were investigated for producing bedding process using cow manure by anaerobic fermentation technology in dairy farms, in order to provide some theoretical references for standardized production，the reasonable and safe use of cow manure as bedding. 【Method】 Samples were collected from four large-scale dairy farms, including cow manure before anaerobic fermentation, cow manure after solid-liquid separation during anaerobic fermentation, and cow manure bedding on the bed.Bacterial DNA was extracted for high-throughput 16S rRNA sequencing, and the microbial diversity, composition, and significant differences in characteristic microbial communities at different stages were analyzed. 【Result】 Compared with cow manure before fermentation, the diversity and richness of microbial communities in cow manure after anaerobic fermentation solid-liquid separation were reduced, but were similar to those in cow manure substrate.The phyla and genus with the highest abundance in cow manure before fermentation were Firmicutes (55.15%) and UCG-005 (16.68%), respectively.The phyla and genus with the highest abundance in cow manure after anaerobic fermentation solid-liquid separation were Firmicutes (48.12%) and Bacillus (12.16%), respectively.The phyla and genus with the highest abundance in cow manure bedding were Actinobacteriota (37.02%) and Glutamicibacter (11.65%), respectively.LEfSe analysis showed that there were a total of 14 bacterial genera with significant differences between the three groups of cow manure before fermentation, cow manure after anaerobic fermentation solid-liquid separation, and bedding. 【Conclusion】 Through the study of the microbial community composition during anaerobic fermentation of cow manure production in dairy farms, it was found that the dominant bacterial phyla and genus had undergone significant changes.After fermentation treatment, the diversity and richness of the microbial community had decreased.This production process could meet the safety requirements of dairy farms for cow manure production.

Key words: cow manure; bedding; 16S rRNA; bacterial community; anaerobic fermentation

中图分类号:

S811.6

王文凯, 隋洁, 许怡静, 陶麒元, 茹彩霞, 魏泽辉, 辛亚平, 巴桑珠扎, 贾存灵. 奶牛场厌氧发酵牛粪生产垫料工艺中菌群变化的研究[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2024, 51(9): 4182-4189.

WANG Wenkai, SUI Jie, XU Yijing, TAO Qiyuan, RU Caixia, WEI Zehui, XIN Yaping, BASANG Zhuzha, JIA Cunling. Study on Bacterial Flora Changes in Producing Bedding Process Using Cow Manure by Anaerobic Fermentation Technology in Dairy Farms[J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2024, 51(9): 4182-4189.

参考文献

[1] 毕美家,刘亚清,王加启,等.中国奶业高质量发展战略研究报告[J].中国奶牛,2023,11:1-15. BI M J,LIU Y Q,WANG J Q,et al.Research on high quality development strategy of China’s dairy industry[J]. China Dairy Cattle,2023,11:1-15.(in Chinese)
[2] 杜云,王盼柳,王斌圣,等.牛粪再生垫料生产过程中物料特性及致病菌变化[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(18):197-203. DU Y,WANG P L,WANG B S,et al.Changes of material characteristics and pathogens in producing process of recycled manure solids[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2020,36(18):197-203.(in Chinese)
[3] FOURNEL S,GODBOUT S,RUEL P,et al.Production of recycled manure solids for use as bedding in Canadian dairy farms:Ⅱ.Composting methods[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2019,102(2):1847-1865.
[4] YAJIMA A,OWADA H,KOBAYASHI S,et al.Cacao bean husk:An applicable bedding material in dairy free-stall barns[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2017,30(7):1048.
[5] FERNÁNDEZ A,MAINAU E,MANTECA X,et al.Impacts of compost bedded pack barns on the welfare and comfort of dairy cows[J].Animals,2020,10(3):431.
[6] COLE K J,HOGAN J S.Environmental mastitis pathogen counts in free stalls bedded with composted and fresh recycled manure solids[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2016,99(2):1501-1505.
[7] 王盼柳,施正香,曾雅琼,等.牛床再生垫料生产技术模式和产业需求分析[J].中国畜牧杂志,2017,53(3):147-153. WANG P L,SHI Z X,ZENG Y Q,et al.Analysis of production technology models and industry demand of recycled manure solids as bedding[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Science,2017,53(3):147-153.(in Chinese)
[8] HUSFELDT A W,ENDRES M I,SALFER J A,et al.Management and characteristics of recycled manure solids used for bedding in Midwest free-stall dairy herds[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2012,95(4):2195-2203.
[9] SORTER D E,KESTER H J,HOGAN J S.Bacterial counts in recycled manure solids bedding replaced daily or deep packed in free-stalls[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2014,97(5):2965-2968.
[10] LEACH K A,ARCHER S C,BREEN J E,et al.Recycling manure as cow bedding:Potential benefits and risks for UK dairy farms[J].The Veterinary Journal,2015,206(2):123-130.
[11] LASPRILLA-MANTILLA M I,WAGNER V,PENA J,et al.Effects of recycled manure solids bedding on the spread of gastrointestinal parasites in the environment of dairies and milk[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2019,102(12):11308-11316.
[12] DAI T,WEN D,BATES C T,et al.Nutrient supply controls the linkage between species abundance and ecological interactions in marine bacterial communities[J].Nature Communications,2022,13(1):175.
[13] VASILIAUSKIENĖ D,PRANSKEVI AČG IUS M,DAUKNYS R,et al.Changes in microbiota composition during the anaerobic digestion of macroalgae in a three-stage bioreactor[J].Microorganisms,2024,12(1):109.
[14] 胡平.基于宏基因组测序对奶牛运动场土壤和粪便微生物群落结构的分析[J].养殖与饲料,2022,21(2):4-8. HU P.Analysis of soil and fecal microbial community structure in dairy cattle exercise yards based on metagenomic sequencing[J].Animals Breeding and Feed,2022,21(2):4-8.(in Chinese)
[15] NICHOLSON F A,GROVES S J,CHAMBERS B J.Pathogen survival during livestock manure storage and following land application[J].Bioresource Technology,2005,96(2):135-143.
[16] CAMPANARO S,TREU L,RODRIGUEZ-R L M,et al.New insights from the biogas microbiome by comprehensive genome-resolved metagenomics of nearly 1600 species originating from multiple anaerobic digesters[J].Biotechnology for Biofuels,2020,13:1-18.
[17] BEAUCHEMIN J,FRÉCHETTE A,THÉRIAULT W,et al.Comparison of microbiota of recycled manure solids and straw bedding used in dairy farms in Eastern Canada[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2022,105(1):389-408.
[18] ZHU H,MIAO R,TAO X,et al.Longitudinal changes in milk microorganisms in the first two months of lactation of primiparous and multiparous cows[J].Animals,2023,13(12):19-23.
[19] CHEN H,LIU Y,HUANG K,et al.Fecal microbiota dynamics and its relationship to diarrhea and health in dairy calves[J].Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology,2022,13(1):1-20.
[20] MEOLA M,LAZZARO A,ZEYER J.Diversity,resistance and resilience of the bacterial communities at two alpine glacier forefields after a reciprocal soil transplantation[J].Environmental Microbiology,2014,16(6):1918-1934.
[21] ABID M,WU J,SEYEDSALEHI M,et al.Novel insights of impacts of solid content on high solid anaerobic digestion of cow manure:Kinetics and microbial community dynamics[J].Bioresource Technology,2021,333:125205.
[22] SINGH S,SHYU D J H.Perspective on utilization of Bacillus species as plant probiotics for different crops in adverse conditions[J].AIMS Microbiology,2024,10(1):220-238.
[23] CHEN M,DING C,HE T,et al.Efficient hydroxylamine removal through heterotrophic nitrification by novel bacterium Glutamicibacter Arilaitensis EM-H8[J].Chemosphere,2022,288:132475.
[24] SHAO H,ZHANG C,WANG C,et al.Intestinal mucosal bacterial diversity of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) mice treated with Debaryomyces hansenii and Qiweibaizhu powder[J].3 Biotech,2020,10:1-11.
[25] 张颖,杨悦,韦庆慧,等.鞘氨醇单胞菌的特性及应用研究进展[J].化学与生物工程,2021,38(3):6-13. ZHANG Y,YANG Y,WEI Q H,et al.Research progress in characteristic and application of Sphingomonas[J]. Chemistry & Bioengineering,2021,38(3):6-13.(in Chinese)
[26] COSTA A,GUSMARA C,GARDONI D,et al.The effect of anaerobic digestion and storage on indicator microorganisms in swine and dairy manure[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2017,24:24135-24146.
[27] ORZI V,SCAGLIA B,LONATI S,et al.The role of biological processes in reducing both odor impact and pathogen content during mesophilic anaerobic digestion[J].Science of the Total Environment,2015,526:116-126.
[28] GDDDEN S,BEY R,LURCH K,et al.Ability of organic and inorganic bedding materials to promote growth of environmental bacteria[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2008,91(1):151-159.
[29] NARULA R,GRIMBERG S J,ROGERS S,et al.Pathogen reduction and factors responsible for pathogen reduction in dairy farm operations treating dairy manure[J].Biological Engineering Transactions,2011,4(3):115-131.