伪狂犬病毒感染对BHK-21悬浮细胞内质网应激和未折叠蛋白反应的影响

doi:10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2022.08.039

中国畜牧兽医 ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (8): 3235-3244.doi: 10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2022.08.039

伪狂犬病毒感染对BHK-21悬浮细胞内质网应激和未折叠蛋白反应的影响

陈丽^1,2,3, 倪敏舒^2,4, 徐悦², 鲍熹², 庄腾寒², 冯磊^2,3,4,5, 郭美锦¹

1. 华东理工大学生物反应器工程国家重点实验室, 上海 200237;
2. 江苏省农业科学院动物免疫工程研究所, 南京 210014;
3. 江苏省动物重要疫病与人兽共患病防控协同创新中心, 扬州 225009;
4. 江苏大学药学院, 镇江 212013;
5. 江苏省食品质量安全重点实验室——省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地, 南京 210014

收稿日期:2022-01-20 出版日期:2022-08-05 发布日期:2022-07-21
通讯作者: 冯磊, 郭美锦 E-mail:fenglei@jaas.ac.cn;guo_mj@ecust.edu.cn
作者简介:陈丽,E-mail:chenli1128@126.com。
基金资助:
江苏省重点研发计划(BE2020407)

Effect of PRV Infection on the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Unfolded Protein Response in Suspension-cultured BHK-21 Cells

CHEN Li^1,2,3, NI Minshu^2,4, XU Yue², BAO Xi², ZHUANG Tenghan², FENG Lei^2,3,4,5, GUO Meijin¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China;
2. Institute of Veterinary Immunology & Engineering, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China;
3. Jiangsu Co-innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou 225009, China;
4. School of Pharmacy, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China;
5. Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety-State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Ministry of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210014, China

Received:2022-01-20 Online:2022-08-05 Published:2022-07-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】探讨伪狂犬病毒(PRV)感染对BHK-21悬浮细胞内质网应激及未折叠蛋白反应(UPR)的影响。【方法】将悬浮的乳仓鼠肾细胞(BHK-21)以感染复数(MOI)0.01接种PRV,分别在接毒后12、24、36、48和56 h取样,用CCK-8法检测细胞存活率,按Reed-Muench法检测病毒滴度,筛选病毒接种处理的合适时间;以不接毒细胞作对照组,分别在感染后12、24、36和48 h取样,用实时荧光定量PCR法检测内质网应激标志分子葡萄糖调节蛋白78(GRP78)及UPR的3种感受蛋白(PERK、IRE1、ATF6)相关通路中基因的表达变化,Western blotting法检测相关蛋白的表达变化。在接种PRV同时分别加入0、0.001、0.005、0.01和0.02 μmol/L内质网应激诱导剂毒胡萝卜素(Tg)和0、20、40、80和160 μmol/L内质网应激抑制剂牛磺熊去氧胆酸(TUDCA),48 h收集细胞测定病毒滴度和细胞存活率。【结果】PRV感染56 h细胞存活率低于70%,感染48 h时病毒滴度达到最高(8.1 lg TCID₅₀/mL),因此后续试验分别在接毒后12、24、36和48 h取样。与对照组相比,PRV感染36和48 h GRP78转录水平均极显著升高(P＜0.01);PERK通路中,转录激活因子4(ATF4)转录水平在PRV感染36、48 h均极显著升高(P＜0.01),生长抑制DNA损伤基因34(GADD34)转录水平在PRV感染36 h显著升高(P＜0.05)、48 h极显著升高(P＜0.01),磷酸化真核翻译起始因子(P-eIF2α)蛋白水平在PRV感染36、48 h均极显著升高(P＜0.01);IRE1通路中,PRV感染组细胞36 h后多以剪切形式sXBP1存在,同时下游p58^IPKmRNA水平在36 h显著增加(P＜0.05),p58^IPK和EDEM mRNA水平在48 h均极显著增加(P＜0.01);ATF6通路中,PRV感染不同时间ERp57、PDI、Calnexin和Calreticulin的表达均无显著变化(P＞0.05)。与0 μmol/L组相比,0.01和0.02 μmol/L Tg极显著降低细胞存活率(P＜0.01),0.005和0.01 μmol/L Tg均极显著增加了PRV病毒滴度(P＜0.01)。【结论】PRV感染可以诱导BHK-21悬浮细胞内质网应激,激活UPR的PERK和IRE1信号通路,说明PRV利用内质网应激增强其复制。

关键词: 伪狂犬病毒; BHK-21悬浮细胞; 内质网应激; 未折叠蛋白反应

Abstract: 【Objective】 This study was aimed to investigate the effect of Pseudorabies virus (PRV) infection on endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER) and unfolded protein response (UPR) in BHK-21 suspension-cultured cells.【Method】 The suspension-cultured baby hamster kidney cells (BHK-21) were infected by PRV at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01.Samples were taken at 12,24,36,48 and 56 h after inoculation,respectively.Cell survival rate was detected by CCK-8 method,and virus titer was detected by Reed-Muench method,and the appropriate time of virus inoculation was screened.The uninfected cells were used as control group.Samples were taken at 12,24,36,and 48 h after infection,and the gene expression changes in the pathways related to endoplasmic reticulum stress marker GRP78 and UPR receptor proteins (PERK,IRE1 and ATF6) were detected by Real-time quantitative PCR,the expression of related proteins were detected by Western blotting.Endoplasmic reticulum stress inducer toxocarotene (Tg) of 0,0.001,0.005,0.01 and 0.02 μmol/L and endoplasmic reticulum stress inhibitor taurodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) of 0,20,40,80 and 160 μmol/L were added to PRV at the same time.Cells were collected at 48 h to determine virus titer and cell survival rate.【Result】 The relative cell viability was less than 70% after 56 h,and the viral titer reached 8.1 lg TCID₅₀/mL at 48 h after PRV infection.Therefore,samples within 48 h (12,24,36 and 48 h) post PRV infection were selected to perform the analysis of endoplasmic reticulum stress.Compared with control group,the transcript levels of GRP78 were extremely significantly increased at 36 and 48 h by PRV infection (P<0.01).In the PERK pathway,the transcript level of ATF4 was extremely significantly increased at 36 and 48 h (P<0.01),and the transcript level of GADD34 was significantly increased at 36 h (P<0.05) and extremely significantly increased at 48 h (P<0.01).The level of eIF2α phosphorylation was extremely significantly increased at 36 and 48 h by PRV infection (P<0.01).In the IRE1 pathway,sXBP1 (spliced XBP1) was founded from 36 h after PRV infection.The transcript level of p58^IPK was significantly increased at 36 h (P<0.05),and the transcript levels of p58^IPK and EDEM were extremely significantly increased at 48 h(P<0.01).In the ATF6 pathway,there were no significant changes in the transcript levels of ERp57,PDI,Calnexin,and Calreticulin (P>0.05).Compared with 0 μmol/L group,cell viability were extremely significantly decreased by 0.01 and 0.02 μmol/L Tg,PRV titers were extremely significantly increased by 0.005 and 0.01 μmol/L Tg(P<0.01).【Conclusion】 Endoplasmic reticulum stress was induced,and PERK and IRE1 signaling pathways of UPR were activated by PRV infection in suspension-cultured BHK-21 cells.The PRV deployed endoplasmic reticulum stress to enhance its replication.

Key words: Pseudorabies virus; BHK-21 suspension-cultured cells; endoplasmic reticulum stress; unfolded protein response

中图分类号:

S855.3

陈丽, 倪敏舒, 徐悦, 鲍熹, 庄腾寒, 冯磊, 郭美锦. 伪狂犬病毒感染对BHK-21悬浮细胞内质网应激和未折叠蛋白反应的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(8): 3235-3244.

CHEN Li, NI Minshu, XU Yue, BAO Xi, ZHUANG Tenghan, FENG Lei, GUO Meijin. Effect of PRV Infection on the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Unfolded Protein Response in Suspension-cultured BHK-21 Cells[J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2022, 49(8): 3235-3244.

参考文献

[1] FERAL K,JAUD M,PHILIPPE C,et al.ER stress and unfolded protein response in leukemia:Friend,foe,or both?[J].Biomolecules,2021,11(2):199.
[2] IVANOVA E A,OREKHOV A N.The role of endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response in atherosclerosis[J].International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2016,17(2):193.
[3] 田丽平,冯冠榕,鲁会军,等.冠状病毒感染与内质网应激研究进展[J].病毒学报,2022,38(2):456-459. TIAN L P,FENG G R,LU H J,et al.Research advances in Coronavirus infection and endoplasmic reticulum stress[J].Chinese Journal of Virology,2022,38(2):456-459.(in Chinese)
[4] CHRISTEN V,MEILI N,FENT K.Microcystin-LR induces endoplasmatic reticulum stress and leads to induction of NFkappaB,interferon-alpha,and tumor necrosis factor-alpha[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2013,47(7):3378-3385.
[5] HE B.Viruses,endoplasmic reticulum stress,and interferon responses[J].Cell Death and Differentiation,2006,13(3):393-403.
[6] RON D,WALTER P.Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response[J].Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology,2007,8(7):519-529.
[7] HETZ C,SAXENA S.ER stress and the unfolded protein response in neurodegeneration[J].Nature Reviews Neurology,2017,13(8):477-491.
[8] HETZ C,ZHANG K,KAUFMAN R J.Mechanisms,regulation and functions of the unfolded protein response[J].Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology,2020,21(8):421-438.
[9] 赵冬敏,黄欣梅,章丽娇,等.坦布苏病毒感染诱导雏鸭体内未折叠蛋白反应[J].中国农业科学,2021,54(4):855-863. ZHAO D M,HUANG X M,ZHANG L J,et al.The induction of unfolded protein response in Tembusu virus infected ducklings[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2021,54(4):855-863.(in Chinese)
[10] CHAKRABARTI A,CHEN A W,VARNER J D.A review of the mammalian unfolded protein response[J].Biotechnology and Bioengineering,2011,108(12):2777-2793.
[11] LE THOMAS A,FERRI E,MARSTERS S,et al.Decoding non-canonical mrna decay by the endoplasmic-reticulum stress sensor IRE1α[J].Nature Communications,2021,12(1):7310.
[12] WU S X,YE S S,HONG Y X,et al.Hepatitis B virus small envelope protein promotes hepatocellular carcinoma angiogenesis via endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling to upregulate the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor A[J].Journal of Virology,2022,96(4):e0197521.
[13] MCKAY L G A,THOMAS J,ALBALAWI W,et al.The HCV envelope glycoprotein down-modulates NF-κB signalling and associates with stimulation of the host endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway[J].Frontiers in Immunology,2022,13:831695.
[14] TROUVE P,FEREC C,GENIN E.The interplay between the unfolded protein response,inflammation and infection in cystic fibrosis[J].Cells,2021,10(11):2980.
[15] MULVEY M,ARIAS C,MOHR I.Maintenance of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) homeostasis in herpes simplex virus type 1-infected cells through the association of a viral glycoprotein with PERK,a cellular ER stress sensor[J].Journal of Virology,2007,81(7):3377-3390.
[16] 刘宇婷,李国新,王斌.疱疹病毒与内质网应激[J].生物工程学报,2021,37(1):67-77. LIU Y T,LI G X,WANG B.Herpesvirus and endoplasmic reticulum stress[J].Chinese Journal of Biotechnology,2021,37(1):67-77.(in Chinese)
[17] YIN H,ZHAO L,JIANG X,et al.DEV induce autophagy via the endoplasmic reticulum stress related unfolded protein response[J].PLoS One,2017,12(12):e0189704.
[18] MULLER T,HAHN E C,TOTTEWITZ F,et al. Pseudorabies virus in wild swine:A global perspective[J].Archives of Virology,2011,156(10):1691-1705.
[19] TAN L,YAO J,YANG Y,et al.Current status and challenge of Pseudorabies virus infection in China[J].Virologica Sinica,2021,36(4):588-607.
[20] SUN Y,LUO Y,WANG C H,et al.Control of swine pseudorabies in China:Opportunities and limitations[J].Veterinary Microbiology,2016,183:119-124.
[21] ZHOU M,WU X,JIANG D,et al.Characterization of a moderately pathogenic Pseudorabies virus variant isolated in China,2014[J].Infection Genetics Evolution,2019,68:161-171.
[22] KLUPP B G.Pseudorabies virus infections[J].Pathogens,2021,10(6):719.
[23] 任春芝,路彩霞,韦英益,等.辣蓼黄酮乙酸乙酯部分对PRV体外诱导RAW264.7细胞分泌炎性因子的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2021,48(3):1132-1140. REN C Z,LU C X,WEI Y Y,et al.Effect of ethyl acetate fraction of flavonoids from Polygonum hydropiper L.on cytokines secretion in RAW264.7 cells induced by Pseudorabies virus[J].China Animal Husbandry&Veterinary Medicine,2021,48(3):1132-1140.(in Chinese)
[24] DELVA J L,NAUWYNCK H J,METTENLEITER T C,et al.The attenuated Pseudorabies virus vaccine strain bartha k61:A brief review on the knowledge gathered during 60 years of research[J].Pathogens,2020,9(11):897.
[25] YANG S,ZHU J,ZHOU X,et al.Induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR) during Pseudorabies virus infection[J].Veterinary Microbiology,2019,239:108485.
[26] REED L J,MUENCH H.A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints[J].American Journal of Epidemiology,1938,27:493-497.
[27] KOHLI E,CAUSSE S,BAVEREL V,et al.Endoplasmic reticulum chaperones in viral infection:Therapeutic perspectives[J].Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews,2021,85(4):e0003521.
[28] BAGCHI P.Endoplasmic reticulum in viral infection[J].International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology,2020,350:265-284.
[29] WANG J,SONG Z,GE A,et al.Safety and immunogenicity of an attenuated chinese Pseudorabies variant by dual deletion of TK&gE genes[J].BMC Veterinary Research,2018,14(1):287.
[30] YANG S,PEI Y,ZHAO A.Itraq-based proteomic analysis of porcine kidney epithelial PK-15 cells infected with Pseudorabies virus[J].Scientific Reports,2017,7:45922.
[31] XUE M,FU F,MA Y,et al.The PERK arm of the unfolded protein response negatively regulates Transmissible gastroenteritis virus replication by suppressing protein translation and promoting type Ⅰ interferon production[J].Journal of Virology,2018,92:e00431-18.
[32] XU C,WANG M,SONG Z,et al.Pseudorabies virus induces autophagy to enhance viral replication in mouse neuro-2a cells in vitro[J].Virus Research,2018,248:44-52.
[33] CATANZARO N,MENG X J.Induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR) suppresses Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) replication[J].Virus Research,2020,276:197820.
[34] HE W,XU H,GOU H,et al.CSFV infection up-regulates the unfolded protein response to promote its replication[J].Frontiers in Microbiology,2017,8:2129.
[35] GLADUE D P,LARGO E,HOLINKA L G,et al. Classical swine fever virus p7 protein interacts with host protein CAMLG and regulates calcium permeability at the endoplasmic reticulum[J].Viruses,2018,10(9):460.

伪狂犬病毒感染对BHK-21悬浮细胞内质网应激和未折叠蛋白反应的影响

Effect of PRV Infection on the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Unfolded Protein Response in Suspension-cultured BHK-21 Cells

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	缪卫媛, 张思琪, 黄昌巧, 赵怡, 陈奇, 谢小东, 韦英益, 于美玲, 胡庭俊. 辣蓼黄酮正丁醇部位对PRV感染3D4/2细胞氧化应激相关因子水平的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2023, 50(1): 349-358.
[2]	唐琳, 张军芳, 王英, 孙斌, 王恩泽, SHIN Jongsuh, 郭盼盼, 金鑫, 严昌国, 李香子, 李强. 犬脂肪来源间充质干细胞对重症急性胰腺炎体外内质网应激模型的抗凋亡作用[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(5): 1840-1851.
[3]	余婕, 胡修忠, 向敏, 王定发, 陶弼菲, 夏瑜, 陶虎, 熊琪, 程蕾. 精氨酸对干扰素-tau处理牛子宫内膜上皮细胞基因表达的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2021, 48(7): 2495-2503.
[4]	徐宁, 葛桂阳, 李东丽, 刘艺, 宫庆龙, 麻宝艺, 盛陈艳, 时坤, 李健明, 冷雪, 杜锐. 猪伪狂犬病毒的分离鉴定及其部分毒力基因序列遗传变异分析[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2021, 48(5): 1794-1803.
[5]	辛海瑞, 张闯, 郝月, 顾宪红. 猪肝星状细胞内质网应激模型的建立及对泛素化的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2020, 47(2): 399-406.
[6]	李辉, 葛延松, 白鸽, 张千振, 孔祥东, 孟伟静, 王洪斌. 富氢生理盐水干预小型猪肝脏缺血再灌注合并肝脏部分切除损伤中内质网应激影响的研究[J]. 《中国畜牧兽医》, 2018, 45(6): 1692-1699.
[7]	庞旋飞, 练斯南, 李中圣, 万曾培, 白挨泉. 一株猪伪狂犬病病毒变异株的分离鉴定[J]. 《中国畜牧兽医》, 2018, 45(1): 196-205.
[8]	王淞, 曾昊, 陈智, 焦安琪, 张树金, 于江, 孙文博, 张玉玉, 陈蕾, 杜以军, 李俊, 吴家强, 王金宝. 山东省猪腹泻病例中PEDV、TGEV和PRV的感染调查与分析[J]. 《中国畜牧兽医》, 2017, 44(7): 2165-2170.
[9]	陈如敬, 吴学敏, 陈秋勇, 严山, 车勇良, 王晨燕, 王隆柏, 周伦江. 猪伪狂犬病病毒SYBR GreenⅠ实时荧光定量PCR方法的建立[J]. 《中国畜牧兽医》---唯一指定的官方网站, 2016, 43(7): 1717-1722.
[10]	李帅峰, 胡林, 汪加兴, 张淑君. 线粒体未折叠蛋白反应的研究进展[J]. , 2015, 42(7): 1787-1792.
[11]	张新平，刘建奎，魏春华，戴爱玲，李晓华，杨小燕. 猪伪狂犬病病毒福建株gB、gD基因的克隆和序列分析[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2014, 41(5): 62-65.
[12]	孙磊磊, 程艺, 梁梓森, 周慧英, 琚春梅. 伪狂犬病毒EP0基因的克隆及其在大肠杆菌中的表达研究[J]. , 2012, 39(6): 57-60.
[13]	张智明;任德强;戴秀莉;张立恒;潘兴广. 猪伪狂犬病毒H株gE基因的克隆及序列分析[J]. , 2010, 37(3): 99-101.