[1] Knobil E, Neill J D. The Physiology of Reproduction[M]. 2nd. New York:Raven Press,1994.
[2] Primakoff P, Myles D G. Penetration, adhesion, and fusion in mammalian sperm-egg interaction[J]. Science, 2002, 296(5576):2183-2185.
[3] Ikawa M, Inoue N, Benham A M, et al. Fertilization:A sperm's journey to and interaction with the oocyte[J]. J Clin Invest, 2010, 120(4):984-994.
[4] Oren-Benaroya R, Orvieto R, Gakamsky A, et al. The sperm chemoattractant secreted from human cumulus cells is progesterone[J].Hum Reprod, 2008, 23(10):2339-2345.
[5] Lishko P V, Botchkina I L, Kirichok Y. Progesterone activates the principal Ca2+ channel of human sperm[J].Nature, 2011, 471(7338):387-391.
[6] Hong S J, Chiu P C, Lee K F, et al. Cumulus cells and their extracellular matrix affect the quality of the spermatozoa penetrating the cumulus mass[J]. Fertil Steril, 2009, 92(3):971-978.
[7] Fatehi A N, Zeinstra E C, Kooij R V, et al. Effect of cumulus cell removal of in vitro matured bovine oocytes prior to in vitro fertilization on subsequent cleavage rate[J]. Theriogenolngy, 2002, 57(4):1347-1355.
[8] Li R, Norman G R, Armstrong D T, et al. Oocyte-secreted factor(s) determine functional differences between bovine mural granulosa cells and cumulus cells[J]. Biol Reprod, 2000, 63(3):839-845.
[9] Guidobaldi H A, Teves M E, Uñates D R, et al. Progesterone from the cumulus cells is the sperm chemoattractant secreted by the rabbit oocyte cumulus complex[J].PLoS One, 2008, 3(8):e3040.
[10] Aparicio I M, Garcia-Herreros M, O'Shea L C, et al. Expression, regulation, and function of progesterone receptors in bovine cumulus oocyte complexes during in vitromaturation[J]. Biol Reprod, 2011, 84(5):910-921.
[11] Arck P, Hansen P J, Mulac Jericevic B, et al. Progesterone during pregnancy:Endocrine-immune cross talk in mammalian species and the role of stress[J].Am J Reprod Immunol, 2007, 58(3):268-279.
[12] Falsetti C, Baldi E, Krausz C, et al. Decreased responsiveness to progesterone of spermatozoa in oligozoospermic patients[J]. J Androl, 1993, 14(1):17-22.
[13] Shimada M, Yanai Y, Okazaki T, et al. Hyaluronan fragments generated by sperm-secreted hyaluronidase stimulate cytokine/chemokine production via the TLR2 and TLR4 pathway in cumulus cells of ovulated COCs, which may enhance fertilization[J]. Development, 2008, 135(11):2001-2011.
[14] Baulieu E E. Contragestion and other clinical applications of RU486, an antiprogesterone at the receptor[J]. Science, 1989, 245(4924):1351-1357.
[15] Baulieu E E. RU486 as an antiprogesterone steroid:From receptor to contragestion and beyond[J]. JAMA, 1989, 262(13):808-814.
[16] Juneja S C, Dodson M G. In vitro effect of RU486 on sperm-egg interaction in mice[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1990, 163(Pt1):216-221.
[17] Zhou C, Kang W, Baba T. Functional characterization of double-knockout mouse sperm lacking SPAM1 and ACR or SPAM1 and PRSS21 in fertilization[J]. J Reprod Dev, 2012, 58(3):330-337.
[18] Richards J S. Ovulation:New factors that prepare the oocyte for fertilization[J]. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 2005, 234(1-2):75-79.
[19] Knobil E, Neill J D. The Physiology of Reproduction[M]. New York:Raven Press,1988.
[20] Jin M, Fujiwara E, Kakiuchi Y, et al. Most fertilizing mouse spermatozoa begin their acrosome reaction before contact with the zona pellucida during in vitro fertilization[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2011, 108(12):4892-4896.
[21] Jang S, Yi L S. RU486 suppresses progesterone-induced acrosome reaction in boar spermatozoa[J]. J Biochem Mol Biol, 2002, 35(6):604-608.
[22] Barón L, Fara K, Zapata-Carmona H, et al. Participation of protein kinases and phosphatases in the progesterone-induced acrosome reaction and calcium influx in human spermatozoa[J]. Andrology, 2016, 4(6):1073-1083.
[23] Chen S H, Dharmarajan A M, Wallach E E, et al. RU486 inhibits ovulation, fertilization and early embryonic development in rabbits:In vivo and in vitrostudies[J]. Fertil Steril, 1995, 64(3):627-633.
[24] Yang J, Serres C, Baulieu E E, et al. RU486 inhibits penetration of human spermatozoa into zona-free hamster oocytes[J]. Int J Androl, 1996, 19(1):61-66. |