中国畜牧兽医 ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (12): 4554-4566.doi: 10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2021.12.024

• 遗传繁育 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国荷斯坦奶牛不同地区、泌乳天数及胎次的产奶量校正系数研究

徐伟1, 董飞1, 马志愤1,2, 亓建刚3, 常瑶4, 陈少侃5, 姜兴刚6, 王雅春4   

  1. 1. 一牧科技(北京)有限公司, 北京 100016;
    2. 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所, 北京 100193;
    3. 萨诺(杨凌)现代动物营养有限公司, 咸阳 712100;
    4. 中国农业大学动物科技学院, 北京 100193;
    5. 北京首农畜牧发展有限公司, 北京 100029;
    6. 黑龙江省农业科学院畜牧兽医分院, 齐齐哈尔 161005
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-22 出版日期:2021-12-20 发布日期:2021-12-02
  • 通讯作者: 王雅春 E-mail:wangyachun@cau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:徐伟(1991-),男,安徽阜阳人,硕士,研究方向:分子数量遗传学,E-mail:405432986@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家现代农业产业技术体系;长江学者和创新团队发展计划(IRT_15R62);农业品种改良提升专项(2130135)

Study on Milk Yield Adjustment Coefficients for Different Region, Days in Milk and Parity in Chinese Holstein Dairy Cows

XU Wei1, DONG Fei1, MA Zhifen1,2, QI Jiangang3, CHANG Yao4, CHEN Shaokan5, JIANG Xinggang6, WANG Yachun4   

  1. 1. EYIMU Science and Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing 100016, China;
    2. Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China;
    3. Sano (Yangling) Modern Animal Nutrition Co., Ltd., Xianyang 712100, China;
    4. College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
    5. Beijing Sunlon Animal Husbandary Develpoment Co., Ltd., Beijing 100029, China;
    6. Branch of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tsitsihar 161005, China
  • Received:2021-04-22 Online:2021-12-20 Published:2021-12-02

摘要: 本研究通过对规模化牧场测定日数据进行分析,旨在估计不同地区305 d校正产奶量对应泌乳天数(DIM)的校正系数与胎次校正系数。利用Wood(不完全伽玛)模型对来自不同温度带9个参考群11 749头荷斯坦奶牛2010-2020年间的683 160条测定日产奶量拟合泌乳曲线,估计泌乳曲线参数,计算头胎牛和经产牛1~305 d泌乳天数对应的校正系数,分别分析参考群和验证群305 d校正产奶量和305 d实际累积奶量的差异;利用SAS 9.2中混合线性模型对1~6胎至少有前5个胎记录的牛估计305 d奶量的胎次效应值,并计算1~6胎各胎次的乘法校正系数;比较传统系数和新系数校正结果的差异。结果表明:①参考群头胎牛和经产牛中,泌乳曲线方程的拟合度R2范围分别为0.4593~0.4913和0.5796~0.6341,泌乳高峰日分别为79~85和53 d,泌乳高峰奶量分别为33.1~34.4和46.0~48.6 kg;②对于参考群,头胎牛和经产牛校正系数分别在泌乳≥90 d和泌乳≥30 d基本趋于一致,头胎牛和经产牛泌乳≥60 d的305 d校正产奶量均趋近于305 d实际累积奶量,奶量差值分别在100和200 kg以内;③对于验证群的305 d校正产奶量,头胎牛泌乳≥150 d和经产牛泌乳≥180 d的泌乳天数校正系数适用性更佳,305 d校正产奶量与305 d实际累积奶量比值高于79%;④1~6胎的胎次校正系数分别为1.2121、1.0380、1.0063、1.0000、1.0220和1.0290;⑤与传统系数相比,新泌乳天数校正系数校正效果更好,头胎牛和经产牛新系数校正的305 d奶量较305 d实际累积奶量相差分别在900和700 kg以内;利用新胎次校正系数,2~4胎产奶量可较为准确地校正到5胎成年当量。本研究结果表明,定期更新305 d校正产奶量的泌乳天数与胎次校正系数,便于准确地将不同泌乳天数、不同胎次状态下泌乳牛的产奶量调整到同一基准上,从而更好地比较奶牛个体泌乳性能的高低,为牧场管理提供参考依据。

关键词: 奶牛; Wood模型; 泌乳天数; 305 d校正产奶量; 校正系数

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to estimate the correction coefficient and parity adjustment coefficient of standardized 305-day milk yield corresponding to days in milk (DIM) in different regions, by analyzing the test-day data from scaled dairy farms.Wood model (Incomplete Gamma Function) was used to fit the lactation curves of 683 160 test-day milk yield records from 11 749 Holstein dairy cows from 9 reference population in different temperature zones in China from 2010 to 2020.The parameters of lactation curve were estimated, and the correction coefficients corresponding to the lactation days from 1 to 305 days of primiparous and multiparous cows were calculated.The differences between the standardized 305-day milk yield and actual accumulated milk yield at 305 days of reference group and validation group were analyzed respectively.Mixed linear model in SAS 9.2 was used to estimate the parity effects for cows with at least the first five lactations standardized 305-day milk yield of 1-6 parities, and the multiplicative adjustment coefficients of 1-6 parities were calculated.The difference between the conventional adjustment coefficient and new adjustment coefficient were compared.The results showed that:①For primiparous and multiparous cows of reference population, the goodness of fit (R2) ranges of lactation curve equation were 0.4593 to 0.4913 and 0.5796 to 0.6341, respectively.The peak days of lactation were 79 to 85 and 53 d, the peak milk yield was 33.1 to 34.4 and 46.0 to 48.6 kg, respectively.②In the reference population, the adjustment coefficients were basically consistent when DIM more than 90 d of primiparous and DIM more than 30 d of multiparous cows.Standardized 305-day milk yield for DIM more than 60 d was close to the actual accumulated 305-day milk yield, the difference of milk yield was lower than 100 and 200 kg, for primiparous and multiparous cows, respectively.③For the standardized 305-day milk yield of validation population, adjustment coefficients of DIM more than 150 d of primiparous and DIM more than 180 d of multiparous cows yielded better fitness, the ratio of standardized 305-day milk yield and actual accumulated 305-day milk yield was higher than 79%.④Adjustment coefficients of 1-6 parities were 1.2121, 1.0380, 1.0063, 1.0000, 1.0220 and 1.0290, respectively.⑤Compared with the conventional adjustment coefficient, new adjustment coefficient of DIM derived from current study suited better to adjust the lactation effect, difference between 305-day milk yield standardized by new adjustment coefficient and the actual accumulated 305-day milk yield of primiparous and multiparous cows were within 900 and 700 kg, respectively.Using the new adjustment coefficient, milk production of 2-4 parity cows could be adjusted to 5th lactation to mature equivalent more accurately.The results indicated that updating the adjustment coefficients of DIM and parity for standardized 305-day milk yield regularly was necessary, milk yield of lactating cows with different DIM and parities could be accurately adjusted to the same benchmark.Thus, the comparison of milk performance among individual dairy cows would be more efficient and provided fair reference for management in dairy farm.

Key words: dairy cow; Wood model; days in milk; standardized 305-day milk yield; adjustment coefficient

中图分类号: