›› 2009, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 202-204.

• 经验交流 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种细度测量仪对羊毛纤维直径测定的对比分析

田可川1,2,黄锡霞3,谭学周3,张廷虎2,李英3,吉园园3,吴伟伟2,张沅1   

  1. (1.中国农业大学动物科技学院, 北京 100193; 2.新疆畜牧科学院畜牧科学研究所, 乌鲁木齐 830000;3.新疆农业大学动物科学学院, 乌鲁木齐 830052)
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:2009-04-20 出版日期:2009-06-20 发布日期:2009-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 张沅

Comparative Analysis on Wool-fibre Diameter by Two Instruments

TIAN Ke-chuan1,2,HUANG Xi-xia3,TAN Xue-zhou3,ZHANG Ting-hu2,LI Ying3,JI Yuan-yuan3,WU Wei-wei2,ZHANG Yuan1   

  1. (1.College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193,China; 2.Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science, Urumqi 830000,China; 3.College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052,China)
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:2009-04-20 Online:2009-06-20 Published:2009-06-20

摘要:

为了检验国产动物纤维细度自动测量仪奥达2000的稳定性和准确性,分别用进口的OFDA100细度仪和国产动物纤维细度自动测量仪对来自314只细毛羊的毛样进行测定,再对两者测得的数据作配对性t检验。检验结果表明,二者间差异不显著(P>0.05)。因此,国产动物纤维细度自动测量仪奥达2000性能与OFDA100细度仪没有差异,可以代替进口细度仪OFDA100。

关键词: 奥达2000动物纤维自动测量仪; OFDA100细度仪; 羊毛纤维直径测定; 对比分析

Abstract: To test the accuracy of domestic fibre diameter measurement instrument, AODA2000, wool samples from 314 wool sheep and foreign fibre diameter measurement instrument, OFDA100, were used. Each sample was measured by the tow instruments (AODA 2000, domestic; OFDA100, imported), respectively. Then, the Paired-Sample T Test was done. The results showed that there was no significant difference (P>0.05) in fineness measurement between the two instruments. Therefore, there is no difference between AODA2000 and OFDA100 in measuring fire diameter, and the AODA2000 can take the place of OFDA100.

Key words: AODA2000; OFDA100; measurement of wool-fiber diameter; comparative analysis

中图分类号: