热带假丝酵母、枯草芽孢杆菌与乳酸菌组合对甘蔗尾青贮品质和有氧稳定性的影响

doi:10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2015.12.016

›› 2015, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 3217-3225.doi: 10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2015.12.016

热带假丝酵母、枯草芽孢杆菌与乳酸菌组合对甘蔗尾青贮品质和有氧稳定性的影响

唐振华^1,2, 陈月丽^1,2, 邹彩霞¹, 夏中生², 梁辛¹, 韦升菊¹, 李丽莉¹, 梁贤威¹

1. 广西壮族自治区水牛研究所, 南宁 530001;
2. 广西大学动物科技学院, 南宁 530005

收稿日期:2015-04-25 出版日期:2015-12-20 发布日期:2015-12-30
通讯作者: 邹彩霞, 夏中生 E-mail:caixiazou2002@hotmail.com;zsxia@gxu.edu.cn
作者简介:唐振华(1988-),男,广西柳州人,硕士生,研究方向:动物营养与饲料科学,E-mail:tangzhyaya@163.com
基金资助:
广西自然科学基金(2015GXNSFAA139065);广西水产畜牧兽医局科研计划项目(桂渔牧科1304514)

Effect of Candida tropicalis,Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus Combination on Quality and Aerobic Stability of Sugarcane Tops Silage

TANG Zhen-hua^1,2, CHEN Yue-li^1,2, ZOU Cai-xia¹, XIA Zhong-sheng², LIANG Xin¹, WEI Sheng-ju¹, LI Li-li¹, LIANG Xian-wei¹

1. Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Nanning 530001, China;
2. College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China

Received:2015-04-25 Online:2015-12-20 Published:2015-12-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 试验旨在研究热带假丝酵母(CT)、枯草芽孢杆菌(BS)、植物乳杆菌(LAP)、布氏乳杆菌(LAB)不同微生物添加剂组合对甘蔗尾青贮品质和有氧稳定性影响。本试验设置了10个组。对照组(C)不添加微生物添加剂;Ⅰ1、Ⅰ2、Ⅰ3组分别添加10、20和30 mL/kg的CT+BS菌液;Ⅱ1、Ⅱ2、Ⅱ3组分别添加10、20和30 mL/kg CT+BS+LAP菌液;Ⅲ1、Ⅲ2、Ⅲ3组分别添加10、20和30 mL/kg CT+BS+LAB菌液。添加0.5%尿素作为氮源。结果显示:①与对照组相比,CT+BS处理组pH、乙酸含量显著升高(P< 0.05),乳酸含量、干物质回收率(DMR)显著降低(P< 0.05),有氧稳定性有所降低;②与对照组相比,CT+BS+LAP处理组pH、乳酸含量显著升高(P< 0.05),且可降低青贮有氧稳定性;③与对照组相比,CT+BS+LAB处理组乙酸显著上升,DMR显著降低(P< 0.05),但粗蛋白质(CP)含量、有氧稳定性是所有处理组中最高的。因此,CT+BS处理青贮甘蔗尾品质较差,而CT+BS+LAB能改善甘蔗尾青贮品质,提高有氧稳定性。

关键词: 甘蔗尾青贮; 微生物添加剂; 青贮品质; 有氧稳定性

Abstract: The assay was aimed to investigate the effect of different microbial inoculant combinations of Candida tropicalis (CT),Bacillus subtilis (BS),Lactobacillus plantarum (LAP) and Lactobacillus buchneri (LAB) on the quality and aerobic stability of sugarcane tops silage.There were 10 groups:Sugarcane tops silages with no additives served as control group (C);GroupsⅠ1,Ⅰ2 and Ⅰ3 were treated with CT+BS at 10,20 and 30 mL/kg,respectively;Groups Ⅱ1,Ⅱ2 and Ⅱ3 were treated with CT+BS+LAP at 10,20 and 30 mL/kg,respectively;Groups Ⅲ1,Ⅲ2 and Ⅲ3 were treated with CT+BS+LAB at 10,20 and 30 mL/kg,respectively.Each treatment was treated with 0.5% fresh forge urea.The results showed that:①Compared to control group,CT+BS treatment groups had significantly higher levels of pH and acetic acid (P< 0.05),dry matter recovery (DMR) and lactic acid content were significantly decreased (P< 0.05),and the aerobic stability was lower.②Compared to control group,CT+BS+LAP treatment groups had significantly higher levels of pH and lactic acid (P< 0.05),and the aerobic stability was lower.③In CT+BS+LAB treatment groups,the levels of acetic acid were significantly higher and DMR was significantly lower than control group (P< 0.05),and the CP content and aerobic stability were highest in all groups.So the quality of sugarcane tops silage was lower in CT+BS treatment groups and CT+BS+LAB treatment could improve the quality and aerobic stability of sugarcane tops silage.

Key words: sugarcane tops silage; microbial inoculant; silage quality; aerobic stability

中图分类号:

S852.61

唐振华, 陈月丽, 邹彩霞, 夏中生, 梁辛, 韦升菊, 李丽莉, 梁贤威. 热带假丝酵母、枯草芽孢杆菌与乳酸菌组合对甘蔗尾青贮品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. , 2015, 42(12): 3217-3225.

TANG Zhen-hua, CHEN Yue-li, ZOU Cai-xia, XIA Zhong-sheng, LIANG Xin, WEI Sheng-ju, LI Li-li, LIANG Xian-wei. Effect of Candida tropicalis,Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus Combination on Quality and Aerobic Stability of Sugarcane Tops Silage[J]. , 2015, 42(12): 3217-3225.

参考文献

[1] 任付平.复合微生物菌剂在全株玉米青贮中的应用与研究[D].西安:西北大学,2007.
[2] Arriola K G,Kim S C,Staples C R,et al.Effect of applying bacterial inoculants containing different types of bacteria to corn silage on the performance of dairy cattle[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2011,94(8):3973-3979.
[3] Keles G,Demirci U.The effect of homofermentative and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on conservation characteristics of baled triticale-hungarian vetch silage and lamb performance[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2011,164(1):21-28.
[4] 郑晓灵,刘艳芬,刘铀,等.复合微生物菌剂对甘蔗梢青贮品质的影响[J].中国饲料,2007,16:40-42.
[5] 万江虹,刘艳芬,许瑶,等.添加甲酸、甲醛对甘蔗尾捆裹青贮品质的影响[J].中国草食动物,2008,5:49-51.
[6] 张英丽.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003.
[7] Broderick G A,Kang J H.Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1980,63(1):64-75.
[8] Owens V N,Albrecht K A,Muck R E,et al.Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates[J].Crop Science,1999,39(6):1873-1880.
[9] Kaiser E,Weiss K.A new system for the evaluation of the fermentation quality of silages[A].20th International Grassland Congress[C].Wageningen Academic Pub,2005.
[10] Nishino N,Touno E.Ensiling characteristics and aerobic stability of direct-cut and wilted grass silages inoculated with Lactobacillus casei or Lactobacillus buchneri[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2005,85(11):1882-1888.
[11] 华金玲.添加乳酸菌对整株水稻秸青贮发酵品质的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2006.
[12] 张涛,崔宗均,李建平,等.不同发酵类型青贮菌制剂对青贮发酵的影响[J].草业学报,2005,3:67-71.
[13] Carvalho B F,Avila C L S,Pinto J C,et al.Effects of propionic acid and Lactobacillus buchneri (UFLA SIL 72) addition on fermentative and microbiological characteristics of sugar cane silage treated with and without calcium oxide[J].Grass and Forage Science,2012,67(4):462-471.
[14] Reich L J,Kung L.Effects of combining Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 with various lactic acid bacteria on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2010,159(3):105-109.
[15] 刘元甲,宋鹏,任付平,等.复合微生物发酵青贮玉米饲料对奶牛产奶量及乳成分影响的研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2009,9:493-496.
[16] 荣辉,余成群,李志华,等.添加糖蜜和尿素对象草青贮发酵品质的影响[J].草地学报,2012,5:940-946.
[17] Yunus M,Ohba N,Tobisa M,et al.Effect of glucose and formic acid on the quality of napiergrass silage after treatment with urea[J].Asian Australas Journal of Animal Science,2001,14(2):211-215.
[18] 魏炳栋,党修利,邱玉朗,等.乳酸菌固态发酵酶解对豆粕、棉籽粕和菜籽粕粗蛋白质、pH、酸度及抗营养因子含量的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2014,41(11):107-114.
[19] 赖玉娇,罗海玲,王朕朕,等.添加不同乳酸菌剂对苜蓿青贮营养价值的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2014,41(8):111-116.
[20] Parvin S,Wang C,Li Y,et al.Effects of inoculation with lactic acid bacteria on the bacterial communities of Italian ryegrass,whole crop maize,guinea grass and rhodes grass silages[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2010,160(3):160-166.
[21] 刘建新,杨振海.青贮饲料的合理调制与质量评定标准[J].饲料工业,1999,3:4-7.
[22] 包万华,卜登攀,周凌云,等.青贮饲料添加剂应用的研究进展[J].中国畜牧兽医,2012,39(8):124-128.
[23] 吕文龙.青贮添加剂对不带穗青玉米秸青贮发酵的影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2010.
[24] 傅彤.微生物接种剂对玉米青贮饲料发酵进程及其品质的影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2005.
[25] 郭旭生,周禾,玉柱.不同添加剂对青贮饲料有氧稳定性的影响[J].中国奶牛,2006,9:18-21.
[26] Filya I,Sucu E,Karabulut A.The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation,aerobic stability and ruminal degradability of maize silage[J].Journal of Applied Microbiology,2006,101(6):1216-1223.
[27] 李胜利,史海涛,曹志军,等.粗饲料科学利用及评价技术[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(10):3149-3158.
[28] 郭旭生,丁武蓉,玉柱.青贮饲料发酵品质评定体系及其新进展[J].中国草地学报,2008,30(4):100-106.

热带假丝酵母、枯草芽孢杆菌与乳酸菌组合对甘蔗尾青贮品质和有氧稳定性的影响

Effect of Candida tropicalis,Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus Combination on Quality and Aerobic Stability of Sugarcane Tops Silage

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	冯鹏, 吴宏达, 郑海燕, 杨曌, 王迪, 师臣, 孟凡坤. 外源生物制剂对玉米秸秆和马铃薯渣混贮品质及瘤胃降解率的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(2): 529-538.
[2]	任丽娟, 陈雅坤, 单丽燕, 张晓峰, 许凤莲, 王有月, 王思伟, 王昆, 卜登攀, 王建平, 赵和平, 赵连生. 基于主成分和灰色关联度对全株玉米青贮综合品质的分析[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2021, 48(4): 1211-1221.
[3]	唐振华, 杨承剑, 李孟伟, 梁辛, 郭艳霞, 梁贤威. 植物乳杆菌、布氏乳杆菌对甘蔗尾青贮品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 《中国畜牧兽医》, 2018, 45(7): 1824-1832.
[4]	穆胜龙, 杨冉冉, 周波, 任凤芸, 梁明振, 杜学振, 邹彩霞, 何仁春. 植物乳杆菌和布氏乳杆菌对甘蔗尾青贮品质的影响[J]. 《中国畜牧兽医》, 2018, 45(5): 1226-1233.
[5]	刘月, 周振明, 王国艮, 吴浩, 孟庆翔, 杨军香, 罗峰, 孙守钧. 不同玉米品种全株青贮品质及营养价值的比较分析[J]. 《中国畜牧兽医》, 2018, 45(11): 3043-3050.
[6]	张亚格, 字学娟, 李茂, 周汉林. 绿汁发酵液对柱花草青贮营养成分及品质的影响[J]. , 2016, 43(6): 1475-1480.
[7]	叶杭, 张文昌, 陈国富, 朱小清, 庄益芬. 绿汁发酵液和纤维素酶对香蕉茎+小麦麸混合青贮品质的影响[J]. , 2014, 41(10): 85-90.
[8]	郭天龙;侯先志;韩吉雨;赵子夫. 不同添加剂对甜菜茎叶青贮品质的影响[J]. , 2009, 36(5): 14-17.
[9]	陈育峰;刘艳芬;万江虹;许瑶;卢曦;唐光华. 添加尿素和糖蜜对甘蔗尾打捆青贮品质的影响[J]. , 2008, 1(2): 20-22.