热带假丝酵母、枯草芽孢杆菌与乳酸菌组合对甘蔗尾青贮品质和有氧稳定性的影响

doi:10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2015.12.016

Abstract

Abstract: The assay was aimed to investigate the effect of different microbial inoculant combinations of Candida tropicalis (CT),Bacillus subtilis (BS),Lactobacillus plantarum (LAP) and Lactobacillus buchneri (LAB) on the quality and aerobic stability of sugarcane tops silage.There were 10 groups:Sugarcane tops silages with no additives served as control group (C);GroupsⅠ1,Ⅰ2 and Ⅰ3 were treated with CT+BS at 10,20 and 30 mL/kg,respectively;Groups Ⅱ1,Ⅱ2 and Ⅱ3 were treated with CT+BS+LAP at 10,20 and 30 mL/kg,respectively;Groups Ⅲ1,Ⅲ2 and Ⅲ3 were treated with CT+BS+LAB at 10,20 and 30 mL/kg,respectively.Each treatment was treated with 0.5% fresh forge urea.The results showed that:①Compared to control group,CT+BS treatment groups had significantly higher levels of pH and acetic acid (P< 0.05),dry matter recovery (DMR) and lactic acid content were significantly decreased (P< 0.05),and the aerobic stability was lower.②Compared to control group,CT+BS+LAP treatment groups had significantly higher levels of pH and lactic acid (P< 0.05),and the aerobic stability was lower.③In CT+BS+LAB treatment groups,the levels of acetic acid were significantly higher and DMR was significantly lower than control group (P< 0.05),and the CP content and aerobic stability were highest in all groups.So the quality of sugarcane tops silage was lower in CT+BS treatment groups and CT+BS+LAB treatment could improve the quality and aerobic stability of sugarcane tops silage.

Key words: sugarcane tops silage; microbial inoculant; silage quality; aerobic stability

CLC Number:

S852.61

TANG Zhen-hua, CHEN Yue-li, ZOU Cai-xia, XIA Zhong-sheng, LIANG Xin, WEI Sheng-ju, LI Li-li, LIANG Xian-wei. Effect of Candida tropicalis,Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus Combination on Quality and Aerobic Stability of Sugarcane Tops Silage[J]. , 2015, 42(12): 3217-3225.

References

[1] 任付平.复合微生物菌剂在全株玉米青贮中的应用与研究[D].西安:西北大学,2007.
[2] Arriola K G,Kim S C,Staples C R,et al.Effect of applying bacterial inoculants containing different types of bacteria to corn silage on the performance of dairy cattle[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2011,94(8):3973-3979.
[3] Keles G,Demirci U.The effect of homofermentative and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on conservation characteristics of baled triticale-hungarian vetch silage and lamb performance[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2011,164(1):21-28.
[4] 郑晓灵,刘艳芬,刘铀,等.复合微生物菌剂对甘蔗梢青贮品质的影响[J].中国饲料,2007,16:40-42.
[5] 万江虹,刘艳芬,许瑶,等.添加甲酸、甲醛对甘蔗尾捆裹青贮品质的影响[J].中国草食动物,2008,5:49-51.
[6] 张英丽.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003.
[7] Broderick G A,Kang J H.Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1980,63(1):64-75.
[8] Owens V N,Albrecht K A,Muck R E,et al.Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates[J].Crop Science,1999,39(6):1873-1880.
[9] Kaiser E,Weiss K.A new system for the evaluation of the fermentation quality of silages[A].20th International Grassland Congress[C].Wageningen Academic Pub,2005.
[10] Nishino N,Touno E.Ensiling characteristics and aerobic stability of direct-cut and wilted grass silages inoculated with Lactobacillus casei or Lactobacillus buchneri[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2005,85(11):1882-1888.
[11] 华金玲.添加乳酸菌对整株水稻秸青贮发酵品质的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2006.
[12] 张涛,崔宗均,李建平,等.不同发酵类型青贮菌制剂对青贮发酵的影响[J].草业学报,2005,3:67-71.
[13] Carvalho B F,Avila C L S,Pinto J C,et al.Effects of propionic acid and Lactobacillus buchneri (UFLA SIL 72) addition on fermentative and microbiological characteristics of sugar cane silage treated with and without calcium oxide[J].Grass and Forage Science,2012,67(4):462-471.
[14] Reich L J,Kung L.Effects of combining Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 with various lactic acid bacteria on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2010,159(3):105-109.
[15] 刘元甲,宋鹏,任付平,等.复合微生物发酵青贮玉米饲料对奶牛产奶量及乳成分影响的研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2009,9:493-496.
[16] 荣辉,余成群,李志华,等.添加糖蜜和尿素对象草青贮发酵品质的影响[J].草地学报,2012,5:940-946.
[17] Yunus M,Ohba N,Tobisa M,et al.Effect of glucose and formic acid on the quality of napiergrass silage after treatment with urea[J].Asian Australas Journal of Animal Science,2001,14(2):211-215.
[18] 魏炳栋,党修利,邱玉朗,等.乳酸菌固态发酵酶解对豆粕、棉籽粕和菜籽粕粗蛋白质、pH、酸度及抗营养因子含量的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2014,41(11):107-114.
[19] 赖玉娇,罗海玲,王朕朕,等.添加不同乳酸菌剂对苜蓿青贮营养价值的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2014,41(8):111-116.
[20] Parvin S,Wang C,Li Y,et al.Effects of inoculation with lactic acid bacteria on the bacterial communities of Italian ryegrass,whole crop maize,guinea grass and rhodes grass silages[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2010,160(3):160-166.
[21] 刘建新,杨振海.青贮饲料的合理调制与质量评定标准[J].饲料工业,1999,3:4-7.
[22] 包万华,卜登攀,周凌云,等.青贮饲料添加剂应用的研究进展[J].中国畜牧兽医,2012,39(8):124-128.
[23] 吕文龙.青贮添加剂对不带穗青玉米秸青贮发酵的影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2010.
[24] 傅彤.微生物接种剂对玉米青贮饲料发酵进程及其品质的影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2005.
[25] 郭旭生,周禾,玉柱.不同添加剂对青贮饲料有氧稳定性的影响[J].中国奶牛,2006,9:18-21.
[26] Filya I,Sucu E,Karabulut A.The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation,aerobic stability and ruminal degradability of maize silage[J].Journal of Applied Microbiology,2006,101(6):1216-1223.
[27] 李胜利,史海涛,曹志军,等.粗饲料科学利用及评价技术[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(10):3149-3158.
[28] 郭旭生,丁武蓉,玉柱.青贮饲料发酵品质评定体系及其新进展[J].中国草地学报,2008,30(4):100-106.

Effect of Candida tropicalis,Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus Combination on Quality and Aerobic Stability of Sugarcane Tops Silage

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 7

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	FENG Peng, WU Hongda, ZHENG Haiyan, YANG Zhao, WANG Di, SHI Chen, MENG Fankun. Effect of Exogenous Biological Agents on Silage Quality and Ruminal Degradability of Corn Stalk and Potato Pulp Mixed Silage [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2022, 49(2): 529-538.
[2]	REN Lijuan, CHEN Yakun, SHAN Liyan, ZHANG Xiaofeng, XU Fenglian, WANG Youyue, WANG Siwei, WANG Kun, BU Dengpan, WANG Jianping, ZHAO Heping, ZHAO Liansheng. Analysis of Comprehensive Quality of Whole Plant Corn Silage Based on Principal Component and Grey Correlation Degree [J]. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2021, 48(4): 1211-1221.
[3]	TANG Zhenhua, YANG Chengjian, LI Mengwei, LIANG Xin, GUO Yanxia, LIANG Xianwei. Effect of Applying Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus buchneri on Quality and Aerobic Stability of Sugarcane Tops Silage [J]. , 2018, 45(7): 1824-1832.
[4]	MU Shenglong, YANG Ranran, ZHOU Bo, REN Fengyun, LIANG Mingzhen, DU Xuezhen, ZOU Caixia, HE Renchun. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus buchneri on the Quality of Sugarcane Tops Silage [J]. , 2018, 45(5): 1226-1233.
[5]	LIU Yue, ZHOU Zhenming, WANG Guogen, WU Hao, MENG Qingxiang, YANG Junxiang, LUO Feng, SUN Shoujun. Comparative Analysis of Silage Quality and Nutritive Value of Whole-plant Corn Silage with Different Varieties [J]. , 2018, 45(11): 3043-3050.
[6]	TANG Zhen-hua, ZHOU Ling, ZOU Cai-xia, XIA Zhong-sheng, LIANG Xin, WEI Sheng-ju, LI Li-li, LIANG Xian-wei. Effect of Sugarcane Tops Silage and Corn Straw Silage on the Growth Performance, Digestion and Metabolism, and Blood Biochemical Indexes of Growing Buffalo [J]. , 2016, 43(1): 92-100.
[7]	GUO Tian-long;HOU Xian-zhi;HAN Ji-yu;ZHAO Zi-fu. The Effect of Different Additives on Quality of Beet Silage [J]. , 2009, 36(5): 14-17.